well, the few videos of his I've seen have really turned me off to him. The seemed more like advertisements than informative. I know a lot of people like his videos, and thats great, but I like to hear from people that don't have an income dependant on their youtube videos.
The people who aren't on youtube are still using Pentax Spotmeters, possibly with Zone VI labels plastered on them.
I am one of therm.
And nothing wrong with that. As long as it's not dark, I actually like my Cambron knock-off of a Soligor copy of a Pentax.
There is a faction on this site, however, that believes that if you do youtube, you're a money-grubbing imbecile, as a fairly recent disastrous thread proved to the detriment of the community (in my opinion).
But the people who are going to haul around a glassless, 3d printed spot-meter, and use it enough to be able to make a reasonable comment about it, are probably also on YT, Reddit, etc..
I started this thread with a simple premise: look at the size of the Reveni Labs reflective meter next to the palm size Sekonic L-398. I like both of them for different reasons. I though the Reveni would be my only meter but missed the ability for incident metering, so I bought yet another Studio Deluxe to fill that need. Somehow, the thread has wandered off onto what is an acceptable spot meter. I’m not sure how it got there but it did. No piece of equipment is right for everyone and new stuff is always circumspect until proven. Will the Reveni Spot be different in a year? Most definitely, because as more people use it, they will provide feedback to the developers. Over all, they really aren’t that expensive compared to a Sekonic and maybe just the right user will write a review.
Once I shake this cold, for my next video, I'm planning to compare it with my Minolta digital spot. I'll also be trying it with the double-A battery adapter.
Great video reviewing the Ravioli Spot Meter (huh? It's REVENI?) I wish I had your sense of humor.
Here's the direct link to Andrew's video.
I'm not convinced that the two-eyes technique is accurate enough. If your eye isn't perfectly centered on the large eyepiece-lens, then your aim of the meter will be off a few degrees.
Matt Marrash may have a YouTube channel, but he's not what I would consider an influencer.
Revini had a table at the Canadian Historical Society camera show in October this year. This was the first time I'd seen the meters in person. The small reflective meter was actually smaller than I was expecting, and the spot meter a little bigger. I bought the tiny reflective meter since it can go anywhere at any time. I have no trouble reading the display without reverting to my glasses, so that's another real bonus.
I've got lots of light meters, so don't really need another spot meter, or incident meter, but the truly tiny form factor of the original meter is something unique and useful that my other meters don't have.
The biggest problem is battery life. The developers are well aware of it and have a new meter with many of the same functions as a Sekonic 308 coming in January. The OLED screen is easy to read but is also the source of battery drain. Store it with the battery removed and it will last a long time. The sensor in the cube reflective meter is essentially the same as one in a phone so it has a wide, 45 degree, angle of acceptance. I have gotten good results and enjoy using mine.
I guess that's why mine came with 4 batteries in the box. No battery issues for me so far, but it's only been a couple of weeks. To be honest, I'm O.K. with removing the battery, since I do that anyway. It just amazes me how they can pack all this utility into such a small package.
As a follow-up, I also got to try out a prototype sample of the new incident meter that can clip onto your hand. I've been thinking about that a bit, and what I don't like is the fact that the dome is fixed in position relative to the display. This can make it awkward to take measurements when your shadow is over the dome. Since you can't reposition the dome relative to the display, it may not be easy to see the display when you take a reading with the dome in the desired position. In that respect, I think it's actually less useful than a conventional Minolta, Sekonic, or Gossen incident meter. It's smaller than a Minolta/Sekonic/Gossen, but not small enough to make it any more convenient, in my opinion. The real advantage of the Revini is the colour temperature feature, which isn't available in the other incident meters, but not something most people really need. The dilemma here is that you can get a good used Minolta/Sekonic/Gossen incident meter for around $100, so that's pretty tough competition for the Reveni. For me, the prototype didn't offer a clear advantage over what I already have, or what I could buy instead.
Thank you for the review of the new meter. I'll stay with my L-398 for incident metering. Hopefully, there will be an update to the cube meter. I heard from the developer about the idea of using a AAA battery insead of the LR44.
I think that reverting to a AAA battery would be a mistake, since the small cube size is the most important feature, to me. A AAA battery is HUGE compared to the current cube meter size. Maybe a 3V lithium coin battery could be a better alternative. Some of them are small too, but maybe not so readily available.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?