• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Reveni labs collimator thoughts?

Kcirtap

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 4, 2026
Messages
1
Location
Canada
Format
4x5 Format
Really interested if anyone has tried the device!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3386-LR.jpg
    67.7 KB · Views: 31

MMfoto

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2004
Messages
487
Format
Super8
I'd like to have one. You can buy old ones for less, but they are usually very old. I wonder about the light sources and power supplies of 30-60 year old electrical devices. The Reveni is a fraction of the price of other new collimators.
 

Dan Daniel

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 4, 2009
Messages
3,027
Location
upstate New York
Format
Medium Format
Mine will be here later this week. Once I figure it out and get a chance to play, I'll do a post here. Maybe there are pre-production samples out there for testing and such. But basically he has just finished assembly and they are starting to ship.

Do you have any specific questions?
 

Dan Daniel

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 4, 2009
Messages
3,027
Location
upstate New York
Format
Medium Format
So the collimator showed up. The overall build is very nice. Nice materials, etc. Seems very sturdy and secure for alignment, etc. Optics all look clean.

The eyepiece cup isn't perfect, but works fine (a little prone to lose position).

The Siemen star is crisp. Very sharp. I'm seeing super fine resolution in the center. So the target is high quality. And very clean.

Testing a few cameras, things are looking good. So I am excited to have it and to be using it.

One problem is that the threads on the eyepeice for focusing are far too tight, at least on my sample. To turn the tube for getting precise focus means using two hands, torquing the whole assembly out of focus, and having to break loose the threads at a larger scale then needed for fine adjustment. I spent a few rounds of filing the threads (one part looks to be 3-d printed nylon or such) and overall diameter down to get a secure but functional focus action.

I wrote to Matt at Reveni about this and he said it is supposed to be this way (super super tight). So either my sample as off, he didn't understand the condition I described, or his idea of achieving fine focus and mine are radically different. Considering that there is a setscrew for the focus setting, I don't see the need for tightness that destroys alignment and isn't functional. Oh well. a little work and all is fine.
 

OAPOli

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
832
Location
Toronto
Format
Medium Format
@Dan Daniel is there a reticle on the eyepiece? Generally the eyepiece focus is adjusted to the reticle and fixed there. And usually the collimator lens is left at infinity and you rack the focus on the test lens to see when it reaches infinity. If you need to do fine focusing it would be done on collimator lens when you're not 100% sure you have reached infinity on the test lens at its stop.
 

Dan Daniel

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 4, 2009
Messages
3,027
Location
upstate New York
Format
Medium Format
Not sure of the terminology and your use of reticle. But yes, the eyepeice is focused to the star when the objective lens is set at infinity. And then it stays there. Hence the set screw. I get snug threads, but there were, as I said, so tight that you need to stress and torque the mounting and have the eyepeice focus jump as the threads 'broke free' and snagged again. No way to do small subtle fine tuning adjustment. Anyway, I got the threads working for me and have the eyepiece focused and locked down.
 

OAPOli

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
832
Location
Toronto
Format
Medium Format
I misunderstood; sorry.

Instead of reticle I should have used graticule. It's helpful for your eye in order to keep focus on the proper plane though the eyepiece.
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,906
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format

what wold an amateur photographer use it for?