Restrainer in Parodinal? KBr or BTA

Chiaro o scuro?

D
Chiaro o scuro?

  • 0
  • 0
  • 103
sdeeR

D
sdeeR

  • 2
  • 0
  • 126
Rouse St

A
Rouse St

  • 1
  • 0
  • 159
Untitled

A
Untitled

  • 3
  • 2
  • 176

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,195
Messages
2,787,690
Members
99,835
Latest member
Onap
Recent bookmarks
1

Herzeleid

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
381
Location
Ankara/Turkey
Format
Multi Format
Hello everyone,

I was wondering if I could replace KBr in the parodinal formula with benzotriazole. If so should we replace it completely or partially? What would be different?
Parodinal formulation I am using now contains %1 KBr.


I have no experience formulating my developers, so I am curious if these compounds are even interchangeable.

Thanks
 

relistan

Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2013
Messages
1,595
Location
Dublin, Ireland
Format
Multi Format
Hello everyone,

I was wondering if I could replace KBr in the parodinal formula with benzotriazole. If so should we replace it completely or partially? What would be different?
Parodinal formulation I am using now contains %1 KBr.


I have no experience formulating my developers, so I am curious if these compounds are even interchangeable.

Thanks

I have not made parodinal but they are both restrainers. Benzotriazole is a stronger restrainer of fog without much impact on developer activity. Potassium bromide is a general restrainer, has an impact on fog and development activity, and can affect the solvency of the silver halide and thus the grain appearance. I would suggest they are not generally replaceable, but it depends on exactly what purpose the potassium bromide is serving in the formula. I would guess you are benefiting from some solvency and might get worse grain behavior with benzotriazole in place of the KBr. But if you are trying to deal with fog, adding some benzo to the working solution might be a good idea.
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,858
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
I never put restrainer in Parodinal. Aceteminophen, sodium sulphite, and sodium hydroxide. Where did you get a recipe with potassium bromide in it?
 
OP
OP
Herzeleid

Herzeleid

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
381
Location
Ankara/Turkey
Format
Multi Format
I never put restrainer in Parodinal. Aceteminophen, sodium sulphite, and sodium hydroxide. Where did you get a recipe with potassium bromide in it?
I can't find the website with the formula at the moment but I will share the recipe I have used. I replace NaOH with KOH, it never forms crystals.

Parodinal-K
Potassium Hydroxide.......................28,3 gr
Paracetamol........... 15gr (Not tablets, from powdered paracetamol)
Sodium sulfite........ 50 gr
KBr........................2.5 gr
Water.....................250ml
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,858
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
nowhere near that much

2.5 g seems like a massive amount - but not if used diluted 1:100 --- that ends up being .0001 g kbr per ml. Even at 1:25, it's .0004 g/ml. It's less than the amount of KBr in D72 at 1:3 (.0007 g/ml).
 
OP
OP
Herzeleid

Herzeleid

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
381
Location
Ankara/Turkey
Format
Multi Format
2.5 g seems like a massive amount - but not if used diluted 1:100 --- that ends up being .0001 g kbr per ml. Even at 1:25, it's .0004 g/ml. It's less than the amount of KBr in D72 at 1:3 (.0007 g/ml).
It is puzzling to me. I haven't observed any adverse effect of that amount. I usually expose for half the box speed of the film. I have also used this formula for developing my silver-gelatin dry plates. Base fog is there with the films and plate I have developed. It is not excessive but within acceptable levels.
 
OP
OP
Herzeleid

Herzeleid

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
381
Location
Ankara/Turkey
Format
Multi Format
Ah you are quoting a formula for 250ml and Donald's site is 100ml. That means you are in fact using the same amount he recommended. Sorry to have missed that.
He has so many variations of the formula. I have just realized that. Some do not contain bromide.
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,858
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
I consider benzo a better fog restrainer than KBr, which I find lowers contrast. However, changing from one to the other will likely have an impact on development times. I'm not sure how it would behave in parodinal.
 
OP
OP
Herzeleid

Herzeleid

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
381
Location
Ankara/Turkey
Format
Multi Format
Well, thanks a lot for your input. I have recently prepared parodinal with NaOH and it has crystals at the bottom which annoys me. I might dump it. Instead, I might add benzotriazole to it. Since the amount of KBr in the formula I have used seems very little in comparison to Donald's final low fog formulation and D72. %10 of KBr mass seems sensible. I come up with that number after observing ID62 formula which uses both restrainers.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,319
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
I abandoned the low fog variants of Parodinal after finding little or no difference with any of the KBr levels I tried. I never tried benzotriazole in Parodinal -- as suggested, I'm pretty sure it would require longer development time (testing on ortho film, where you can easily develop by inspection, would be a starting point to get a differential time relative to no BZT).

And crystals on the bottom of either early-2000s commercial Rodinal or Parodinal are common and were considered normal when Rodinal still came from Agfa, they simply indicate something is in saturation in the solution (IIRC, the chemists suggested the crystals were probably either sulfite or the sulfonate of p-aminophenol).
 
OP
OP
Herzeleid

Herzeleid

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
381
Location
Ankara/Turkey
Format
Multi Format
I abandoned the low fog variants of Parodinal after finding little or no difference with any of the KBr levels I tried. I never tried benzotriazole in Parodinal -- as suggested, I'm pretty sure it would require longer development time (testing on ortho film, where you can easily develop by inspection, would be a starting point to get a differential time relative to no BZT).

And crystals on the bottom of either early-2000s commercial Rodinal or Parodinal are common and were considered normal when Rodinal still came from Agfa, they simply indicate something is in saturation in the solution (IIRC, the chemists suggested the crystals were probably either sulfite or the sulfonate of p-aminophenol).
Thank you, Donald. I don't have enough film stock to do a comprehensive test about the effect of KBr amount. How little effect on the base fog are we talking about, do you have any numbers?

I had crystals with my Agfa Rodinal bottles, but compared to what I have with the recent batch, the amount in the original Rodinal solution was negligible. Using KOH instead of NaOH gives a cleaner stock solution, IMO. I am using the Parodinal K variant nearly more than 2 years. I do not see any shelf-life problems with it.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,319
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
I didn't then have the instruments to measure base plus fog values (now I'd use my spotmeter with +10 diopter to get at least a comparison, but I didn't have diopters to fit the spotmeter at that time); I did eyeball comparison of 35mm .EDU Ultra 100 and 400 rolled from the same bulk rolls. All Parodinal variants I tried produced visibly more fog than HC-110, there was no or almost no visible difference between no KBr and the largest amount I tried.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom