Can you expand on, "There is no generally accepted way to convert an AgX image into its 'PIXEL' equivalent"
Do you have the data that gave them this conclusion:
- The file size was established in the Research Labs who looked at lots of images and decided that the 16 Base size adequately represented consumer 35 mm images
[*]Resolving power of a typical 100 speed color negative film at medium contrast is around 65 line pairs/mm.
Without any verifiable data to support your pixel count, how were you going to support your pixel count?
For some reason I was under the impression that you had data and not just found data.
I DID have data at the time I made the presentation, but it's long gone after 25 years.
In what capacity did you serve - technical or administrative?
BTW, you still haven't presented any of YOUR data
I hear you 100%Hi
pardon me butting into your discussion, but what you say is pretty normal. Its one of the reasons I stopped participating around here. Lots of high contradiction opinions and when data is requested it seldom follows.
What is the point of the thread?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?