Oh... I have such fond memories of cranking out Thévenin circuit analysis. Later on, I would come to understand that it's only really meaningful for DC steady state analysis. Anything with transients or with AC/RF running through the circuit was an entirely different kettle of fish ... and where all the fun was.
WWWWAAAY OT: Anyone else ever have the fun of doing Smith Chart analysis for transmission line and antenna impedance matching analysis?
Oh... I have such fond memories of cranking out Thévenin circuit analysis. Later on, I would come to understand that it's only really meaningful for DC steady state analysis. Anything with transients or with AC/RF running through the circuit was an entirely different kettle of fish ... and where all the fun was.
WWWWAAAY OT: Anyone else ever have the fun of doing Smith Chart analysis for transmission line and antenna impedance matching analysis?
I rember our High school electronics teacher prompting one of the lighting crew folks to tell us the one in Reference 11, 1nd 12 on that page. He also had an official one, but tha was the one that stuck.
Not in the A.F. but in the Army, '76 - '79 with an artillery unit, still using fire control first used in 1950's FADAC Computers, which was a "digital" computer, working out final trajectory of artillery, and, I'd bet they were also used bombers, large and small, etc.
My unit was a Nuclear capable TOW 155mm and 8" SP artillery unit.
Early scientific pocket calculators were used by some officers and senior NCO's to back check FADAC results but, Officially, the FADAC WAS the machine that gave the final answer.
I think I still have a circular slide rule for calculating Smith Chart problems made by Amphenol floating around in the archives around here somewhere.
Not in the A.F. but in the Army, '76 - '79 with an artillery unit, still using fire control first used in 1950's FADAC Computers, which was a "digital" computer, working out final trajectory of artillery, and, I'd bet they were also used bombers, large and small, etc.
My unit was a Nuclear capable TOW 155mm and 8" SP artillery unit.
Early scientific pocket calculators were used by some officers and senior NCO's to back check FADAC results but, Officially, the FADAC WAS the machine that gave the final answer.
Interesting in this context about the Boeing B-29, 1945:
… the B-29 had another element designed to enhance the capabilities of the human crew — a computerized central fire control system. With today’s modern, fly-by-wire warplanes, a centrally controlled, computer-corrected, remotely operated gun turret may not sound impressive, but in World War II it was revolutionary.
Back then, most circuits were discrete components, transistors, caps, resistors, etc. Plus they were on removable plug-in circuit cards. So it was easy to unsolder one lead from the back of the card after removing the card from the rack.
When I was in the USAF in the 1960 learning electronics, we learned this to remember the color code number equivalents.
Bad Beer Rots Our Young Guts But Vodka Goes Well
There was a dirty one as well, but I don't think it's appropriate to post here
Numerically the value (0-9) of a resistor via the color-coded bands:
Black (0), Brown (1), Red (2), Orange (3), Yellow (4), Green (5), Blue (6), Violet (purple, 7), Gray (8), and White (9)
I use one of these old resistor guides, I wish the large electronics distributors like Mouser and Digikey
would offer these guides again, mine is decades old and card board .