Oh, woe is me. My life is an empty shell of emptiness. Thanks for sharing your happiness. That lifted my spirits momentarily.
You must know that, if you do not own a Hasselblad SWC, your life is empty and you know it. And if you didn’t know it, now you do.
Is this better than the Lomo LC-A 120?
I’m afraid I will never be able to answer this question as I will never touch a Lomo LC-A, not even with a 10 fooot pole with a dirty sock on it’s end.
OUCHHmm. The results look the same.
Hmm. The results look the same.
I simply don’t mess around with killing whales for printing Lomo stuff. I only do it if it involves the Highest quality along the whole process. No half-assing.
A very convenient camera, really. I'd prefer to use a Lomo LC-A, however most likely the better purchase would be the Hassy-- I can't figure the lomo LC-A surviving more than 10 years of use.Is this better than the Lomo LC-A 120?
One could rightfully argue it is the single best lens in the world and it would be hard for anyone to counter-argue objectively. It is one of those historical lenses. A jewel. It’s a German Zeiss, simply the best.
The Biogon 38mm will always be a superior lens. It’s simply what it has always been: superior.
why is Lomo stuff half-assing, it isn't "pure" ?? plenty of great images can be made with any sort of camera, doesn't need to be Zeiss lenses Swedish or German cameras, doesn't need to be allegedly the best enlargers and lenses in the world, none of that really matters. all this gear worship is pretty hillarous. at least you got the squirrel nest nice and sharp.
nice squirrel nest!
Yup. Gear worshipping is so cute.
Zeiss moved on to the next frontier. The CPU in your iPhone was "optically printed" with a Zeiss lens.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?