Reloading "exposed" film into Rolleiflex 2.8F

The Gap

H
The Gap

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Ithaki Steps

A
Ithaki Steps

  • 2
  • 0
  • 41
Pitt River Bridge

D
Pitt River Bridge

  • 3
  • 0
  • 54

Forum statistics

Threads
198,997
Messages
2,784,350
Members
99,764
Latest member
BiglerRaw
Recent bookmarks
0

hiroh

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2021
Messages
319
Location
Lisbon
Format
Multi Format
I opened the camera and realized that the film with 0 shots is inside, that I put a month ago. I had to shoot something important, so I put the cap on and shot 12 shots. I pulled out the film from the camera as I normally do, and kept it safe in the dark.

Now, I want to do some tests with my camera, and I though I can use that roll, but I'm not sure, how am I loading it now? Is it the same as I'd load the unexposed film?

This never happened to me before, so I want to check to be sure, because the last shot is now first, but I guess it doesn't matter.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,552
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
When you roll it back in the dark to the other spool by hand, you will need to lift the tape and re-tape it, otherwise the film will buckle. Ilford and Kodak 120, this works fine. I don't know about the tape/paper combination on other films. That is, if the tape comes off the paper easily and re-sticks.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,097
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
For clarity, and I think you may already realize this, it is highly advisable that the film + backing paper be manually rewound back off the take-up spool it currently is on, and on to a new feed spool.
Once you do that - following ic-racer's excellent suggestions of course - the film plus backing paper are again ready to move forward. The tape will be in the right place - pulling rather than pushing the film - and the numbering on the backing paper will again be correct.
 

Slixtiesix

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 31, 2006
Messages
1,408
Format
Medium Format
I would rather try that with a less expensive camera!
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,552
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
I would rather try that with a less expensive camera!

The re-spooling is done by hand, outside the camera. Once re-spooled so there is no buckle, the film + tape should be fine to go through the "automat" sensor rollers of the Rolleiflex.
BTW, this is the same process used to re-spool 120 to 620 spools, though both spoolings are usually done outside a camera (whereas the OP did the first spooling in his camera).

Don't try to re-spool with a camera. I actually did this once in the 1980s with my Rolleiflex SLX. Of course the buckled film jammed, though the fuse did not blow...a gear in the camera broke. Fortunately the USA Rollieflex center was still repairing and updating the SLX, so I got new gears and an updated circuit board (probably because they had a stock of the upgrade boards to get rid of).
 
Last edited:

Dan Daniel

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 4, 2009
Messages
2,902
Location
upstate New York
Format
Medium Format
Other than the respooling issues mentioned, I am wondering if it a good idea to run a roll that loaded and then you opened the back while it was at the first frame. Maybe it'd be better to just wind this roll back and put it in the drawer as a test roll? The risk of fogging and such is real.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom