To me kodak is a dead horse. Their existance will just make trouble to ilford, Foma,... No place on the market of photography for a new film&paper maker. I think we do not need kodak any more. Your vision might differ, up to you. PhotoEnginner is far more usefull to the world of phoptography than whole kodak.
www.Leica-R.com
To me kodak is a dead horse. Their existance will just make trouble to ilford, Foma,... No place on the market of photography for a new film&paper maker. I think we do not need kodak any more. Your vision might differ, up to you. PhotoEnginner is far more usefull to the world of phoptography than whole kodak.
www.Leica-R.com
To me kodak is a dead horse. Their existance will just make trouble to ilford, Foma,... No place on the market of photography for a new film&paper maker. I think we do not need kodak any more. Your vision might differ, up to you. PhotoEnginner is far more usefull to the world of phoptography than whole kodak.
www.Leica-R.com
Well, if Kodak are monitoring this forum they'll delete my entry as well.
My best reason for using film: digital prints look like digital prints.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?