Same quality? Maybe not. I've not used a Paxiscope but I believe Braun is the same Braun that makes some film scanners and other optical devices. The lens is probably decent but not up to the quality of an enlarging lens.cramej, can the Paxiscope in that sense perform the same function as an enlarger and successfully turn a paper negative of whatever size into a positive print on an easel to the same quality print as that achieved from a film negative in an enlarger?
Thanks
pentaxuser
Generally, projection lenses don't need to be as sharp as either film exposure lenses or enlarging lenses, because although there's a lot of magnification involved, those viewing the image will see it from a considerable distance -- the apparent size is comparable to an 8x10 or so print at a comfortable viewing distance (far enough the older ones of us wouldn't need our bifocals). Still, it'll be better than, say, a condenser lens or quizzing glass type magnifier; it's probably a two to four element lens with minimal chromatic aberration (as that's very visible in projection) and somewhat controls spherical aberration and coma -- offset by being much faster than optimum for the formula used.
I believe Braun is the same Braun that makes some film scanners and other optical devices. The lens is probably decent but not up to the quality of an enlarging lens.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?