What notes do you have posted for reference in your darkroom? It may be because I don't often get a chance to print/develop and I need refresher notes or it may just be because I'm a nerd but I have notes around both my wet and dry areas to reference. Generally these are made by me but some are copied from various resources. All are laminated (nerdy).
Wet area notes
-Development times for HC110
-Development times for C41/E6
-Dilutions for various volumes
-Printing times and dilutions
Dry area notes
-Color head settings that correspond with filters
-F Stop chart from Way Beyond Monochrome
I still need to make a form showing what enlarger lens I need for various size negatives (I print from 35mm up to 4x5 and I have to google this every single time) as well as a cheat sheet on toggling different settings/functions of my RH Designs Analyzer Pro. I'd also like to make a sheet or two that gets me started quickly. Essentially I'd like something that told me that for each negative size there was a shorthand for each print size that would give me starting points such as enlarger height, lens, and anything else that might get me printing more efficiently.
My question to you is, what types of notes do you have printed around your darkroom and why?
Thanks,
Omid
I have notes pinned up for the recipes for a few of my most often used developers, like Thornton 2-Bath and PMK.
Let's see...
A sticky-note on the wall behind the enlarger that I use most for flashing with threshold times and apertures for various papers with various filtrations
Have you found your paper is consistent from batch to batch with pre-flashing times?
I have only one negative (that I print with any amount of regularity) that requires preflashing. I buy Ilford MG FB Glossy paper in various sizes and usually in 10, 25, or 100 sheet boxes, depending on the size and whatnot.
When I first wrestled that negative into submission and figured out how to get a good print, I took really careful notes on my preflashing (enlarger height, contrast grade, lens, aperture, times), which I dialed in using 8x10 paper. A year or so later, with the same type of paper but a different batch, I tried to make the print again without re-testing preflash times or doing new test strips, and found that the amount of preflashing needed was different. Not hugely different, but different enough that I wasn't happy with the result on attempt #1, despite having exactly the same process. I've often wondered what caused that, and differences in paper batches seems like the most direct explanation once I ruled out process error. Occam's razor and all that. Suppose it's possible my notes from the first time were inaccurate.
Perhaps it's the developer?
Two:
Courtesy of @RalphLambrecht 's Way Beyond Monochrome, an f-stop printing table - which he has kindly shared here before:
View attachment 404133
And a test print progression that is a practical progression of 1/2 stop exposure times that I created myself.
View attachment 404132
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?