not enough room for an enlarger,
vsTry a 5x7 package of Ilford's new multicontrast RC.
foma fixed grade rc paper works great
Thanks for the feedback. I suspected this would be the case. Is it even worth trying with enlarging paper and a ridiculously small light source? Ex: a single LED or an automotive bulb?BTW I have tried old contact printers with modern papers. Light is too strong and uneven on the hobby type.
This is probably the future for the printing box. Maybe I'll put some UV tubes in there. Project for another day I think.You could also cut down 8x10 paper to size. There is also the possibility of doing alternative processes, such as Van Dyke or Cyanotypes or similar.
I figure I'll practice on cheaper 5x7 paper for now, but I hear you. I may well decide to go that direction once I've figured out how to make prints worth looking at.I shoot 5x7 and *really* like the look of a contact on 8x10 paper. It makes a nice presentation. I use rubylith to mask for white borders.
Well this is interesting. I didn't catch that when looking through the papers at Freestyle & at B and H. I didn't see any details on sensitivity or exposure times in the datasheet.Fomatone is slower than other multigrade papers. In the data sheet Foma recommends it as contact paper, but concedes that it can also be used in an enlarger.
Have you tried this? I'm a little LED-skeptical for photo purposes just knowing that there can be gaps in how continuous the frequencies of light from an LED is vs a tungsten bulb or even the sun, and I know some red LED light isn't a good safelight.Let me make a recommendation:
View attachment 249149
Have you tried this? I'm a little LED-skeptical for photo purposes just knowing that their can be gaps in how continuous the frequencies of light from an LED is vs a tungsten bulb or even the sun, and I know some red LED light isnt a good safelight.
How did you determine exposure times? I'm wondering what 7.5-15 watts in a tungsten bulb translates to in terms of the LED's brightness settings. I suppose there's so much variation that trial and error is way.With LEDs you may have issues with RA-4, as cross-channel can be different, but like many others I found no problem for Variable Contrast BW paper, yes, I tried it well for 8x10" contact copies.
How did you determine exposure times? I'm wondering what 7.5-15 watts in a tungsten bulb translates to in terms of the LED's brightness settings. I suppose there's so much variation that trial and error is way.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?