+1 to this - one of the best purchases I have made for the EF systemI really like the EF 85mm 1.8. Amazing sharpness and fast focusing usm motor. Much cheaper than any L lens and you get great results.
I would like to buy an EF-mount lens primarily for portraiture with Portra. Compositions may range from headshots to full body.
EF 85mm 1.8.
Milvus Planar 1.4/85
Judging from the comments in this thread, it sounds like I need to stick with 85mm. I don't see how else I would have enough flexibility to move from full-body to upper-body (while avoiding true headshots as recommended). Two lenses were mentioned:
No zoom lens was mentioned. That probably says a lot for the value of prime lenses.
Compared to the recommended lenses, does anyone have an opinion on Canon's EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM (versions I, II, or III)?
No zoom lens was mentioned. That probably says a lot for the value of prime lenses.
I owned a 70-200 f/4 L IS
Does anyone have enough experience with various lenses to know how that one compares in color and contrast?
I used to have the predecessor without IS. Excellent optics, fairly lightweight, too. But somehow I never considered replacing it. I prefer the fixed f/2 aperture of my 100/2 over the zoom range that the 70-200 gave me.
something like this
The EF 50/1.2 L is magical in rendering, but it won't work well for head and shoulders. I use it a lot for full body and environmental portraits.
Thanks for the ideas. The 100mm f/2 lens is looking attractive.
For portraiture at 50mm, I am comparing the L lens mentioned by blee1996 to the EF 50mm f/2.5 Macro. The Macro lens has less distortion. What other factors (other than price) might be worth considering when comparing the L lens to the Marco lens?
Speed, size, weight, filter size, focus throw/speed of focusing are all important considerations.
I really like the EF 85mm 1.8. Amazing sharpness and fast focusing usm motor. Much cheaper than any L lens and you get great results.
You are absolutely correct. I was actually trying to ask about differences in image quality. I could have written my question better.
The L lens is chosen for "rendering". The Macro is chosen, potentially, for lack of distortion. Which of these two considerations is more important in portraiture?
You are absolutely correct. I was actually trying to ask about differences in image quality. I could have written my question better.
The L lens is chosen for "rendering". The Macro is chosen, potentially, for lack of distortion. Which of these two considerations is more important in portraiture?
The 85mm is perfect for portraits in which a little bit of the upper body is also in frame, but for pure headshots it is a little problematic, or at least not perfect / optimal. 100mm and 135 are just better for that purpose.
I would like to buy an EF-mount lens primarily for portraiture with Portra. Compositions may range from headshots to full body. I plan to use natural light but may wish to expand later to studio lighting. I prefer flexibility to achieve shallow depths of field.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?