I disagree with this statement. The Yashica Mat's with the Yashinon lens and the Minolta Autocords with Rokkor lens are some of the finest TLR's made and will stand alongside a Rolleiflex and Rolleicord any day.. One of my favorites is the Yashica D..
Build wise they are every bit as good as the Rollei's.
I suppose there might be something different when you move to 1/500th but I am not sure that what governs achievement of a 1/500th sec speed means that it creates problems for the cameras that has been suggested
I have an Agfa Isolette I which has 1/25th; 1/50th and 1/200th speeds and I cannot say that the highest speed affects the camera's handling. My 1/200th is as smooth as the 1/25th.
If there was a 1/500th would this create problems that is inherent in any 1/500th? I doubt it would.
pentaxuser
I disagree.
I have owned some Yashica TLRs and the build quality is decidedly inferior to the german equivalent which is the Rolleicord. Which I own.
And the Rolleiflex quality is even better, and I dare to say they have the highest build quality of all production cameras
Exactly what way are Rolleiflex cameras better build quality? A lot of people say they are better than others but never explain why. So please explain..
Rolleiflex has a reputation which has been greatly exaggerated (just like Leica) over the years. They are just as susceptible to breakage and other issues as is any other camera..My Rolleiflex cameras are fine cameras but I cannot tell the difference between images taken with my Rolleiflex, Yashica Mat, or Minolta Autocord cameras.
Let's just keep this thread on topic. OP has stated that TLR is not what he is looking for, so a discussion whether Rolleiflex (or a Yashica for that matter) is or is not better built is not particularly relevant here, but it would make an interesting topic for a separate thread.
For most people the "build quality" comment means that when operating the camera it feels more substantial and smoother to operate. This may or may not necessarily mean better reliability as most people won't know what's inside but the overall experience is nicer. Resulting images are obviously unaffected by said built quality.
Exactly what way are Rolleiflex cameras better build quality? A lot of people say they are better than others but never explain why. So please explain..
Rolleiflex has a reputation which has been greatly exaggerated (just like Leica) over the years. They are just as susceptible to breakage and other issues as is any other camera..My Rolleiflex cameras are fine cameras but I cannot tell the difference between images taken with my Rolleiflex, Yashica Mat, or Minolta Autocord cameras.
I've been a camera tech since the 70's and have been inside many Rollei's, Yashicas, Autocords, as well as many others and with the exception of some obscure mom & pop brands they all use high quality parts that contrary to popular belief do not break easily.
I would however stay away from the models with the 3 element lens such as the Triotar and Yashikor if you want the best picture taking quality even though these lens are capable performers.
The Air Force had Rollicords and flexs along with a few Yashicas, Mat and LMs, I don't recall seeing any 124G, by the time the 124 came along TLRs were going out replaced by Konica Rapids and other press rangefinders. The Rollies held up with hard day to day use, the few Yashica's film advance failed. I don't know how we got the Yashica's I don't ever recall seeing a Yashica on the table of allowance. In terms of image I cannot fault Yashica, in the 80's and 90's I did a lot of book covers 70% were done with a 124.
I have a 124 with a jammed film advance, and a couple of Ds that just keep on trucking down the line. Given the price difference, I highly recommend Yashica or Minolta.
I like the TLRs but I don't think that's what I'm looking for. I have one, albeit a not-very-good one that doesn't properly work (Halina A1). Not for me.
Rangefinder - hmmm, I have a couple now and they are *OK* but I don't find them quite so easy to focus. Perhaps that is down to the ones I have though.
A Bronica sounds pretty good - I like the Pentax 645Nii but they seem a bit pricey - perhaps that is as you say down to the compatibility of lenses with the digital versions.
I like the TLRs but I don't think that's what I'm looking for. I have one, albeit a not-very-good one that doesn't properly work (Halina A1). Not for me.
Rangefinder - hmmm, I have a couple now and they are *OK* but I don't find them quite so easy to focus. Perhaps that is down to the ones I have though.
A Bronica sounds pretty good - I like the Pentax 645Nii but they seem a bit pricey - perhaps that is as you say down to the compatibility of lenses with the digital versions.
If you are looking for a TLR, I really think the Minolta Autocord is the best bang for your buck if you value a solid build. I've owned several autocords, a Rolleiflex 2.8e and yashica 124G and the Autocord seems to be the best of the bunch. The Rollei is heavy and expensive, the Yashica build is ok but I can't stand the racheting wind.
The autocord is comparable to the Rolleiflex 3.5 in every way but for 2/3 or less of the price.
One of the problems with the Autocord is most sellers are asking far more than they are worth.. I have 2 and would never part with then but they just aren't worth what others want...
In October 2014, I paid $250 for an Autocord in superb condition. It needed no cleaning or adjusting to work - it was ready to go. Worth every penny IMO.
The racheting sound of the Yashica Mats is caused by a dry crank lock.. A little moly grease will make it quiet..
I have an Autocord I want to sell that was recently cleaned up but I don't have enough posts on apug yetThat's what I get for being a lurker. And it's at a much more reasonable price than the "as is" models on ebay.
Oh! Didn't know that, well I'm subscribed nowYou need to be a paid subscriber to list things for sale here.
I will go with a Mamiya C220: very cheap and with interchangeble lens. You have the quality of a Rolleiflex at 1/2 of the price and it offers a complete system. In a small/medium bag you can put in a camera with 3 lens and a Gossen Lunasix. For landscape work the 55mm lens is useful, for portrait works 135mm is more suitable then the Rollei'80mm. I use it for my black and white works, printed in darkroom, and I can't distinguish Mamiya's negatives from those made my Hasselblad (beautiful camera but still expensive if your budget is tight). My 2 cents.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?