Anyone know about this Wolfen/Orwo P400? I just bought a couple of rolls, and cannot find a lot of info. Is this a unique emulsion, or alternate version of Aviphot (both Filmotec, right? I'm getting so confused)?
Anyone know about this Wolfen/Orwo P400? I just bought a couple of rolls, and cannot find a lot of info. Is this a unique emulsion, or alternate version of Aviphot (both Filmotec, right? I'm getting so confused)?
Which does not mean that Pancro400 is in any way similar to TriX or Agfapan400 or any current Adox film. It’s quite a unique film with a very high base/fog as its most prominent difference with other films.
B+F depends a great deal on what you develop the film in, and if the emulsions have been intended to be developed in a limited or broader range of developers. It can also depend on the level of interaction with developer solvency.
Anyone know about this Wolfen/Orwo P400? I just bought a couple of rolls, and cannot find a lot of info. Is this a unique emulsion, or alternate version of Aviphot (both Filmotec, right? I'm getting so confused)?
P400 is an ORWO/Filmotec film (and emulsion). Not rebranded. This is a traffic surveillance film. It's probably based on the N75, but don't be fooled, it's not the same. P400 has EI 250/25 - the marketing has imposed the number 400 on the box.
P400 is an ORWO/Filmotec film (and emulsion). Not rebranded. This is a traffic surveillance film. It's probably based on the N75, but don't be fooled, it's not the same. P400 has EI 250/25 - the marketing has imposed the number 400 on the box.
In 35mm format, I found Pancro 400 to be far too grainy, lacking tonal separation and poor acutance/sharpness. In larger formats (120 and sheets) it's far more serviceable. YMMV of course.
True. My results from a reputable mail order lab were shockingly bad - muddy and grainy, worse than long-expired TMax 3200 (the only comparison in my experience). A roll of 120 shot and processed at the same time was better (passable, not great).