RB67... should I?

HAHAHAHAHHAhahahahahhaa Bridge drug is exactly right. Hooked for life.

"Bridge drug" is kinda true, but let me offer this slightly more positive spin! I went to MF, went "whoa! I want more," and then went on to LF, just like everybody usually does. :rolleyes:

But... then I turned back quite enthusiastically to MF and became a lot more interested in it. One big reason being that there are some really superb 120/220 films now. Films like superpan, atp, etc. Not to mention the price of top-notch gear, which is absurd low at this point.

I'm just saying, let's not let acute formatitis prevent someone from discovering how fantastic a 645 or 67 neg or slide can be.

keithwms said:

For architecture, I'd say the rb is also not the best choice, unless you are willing to do scanning and digital perspective correction and such (which is a very viable route, actually; I am just saying). Even a $200 old crown graphic kicks the butt of pretty much any slr for architecture, IMHO.

Click to expand...

+1, especially with a roll-film back, if you want to stay within the format.

Best,

Michael