I've hacked an instax sq6 to mount to my RB67.
Yep, that was the majority of the labor, shaving down the SQ6 body until it matched up.Nice, so you get the Instax Square film, a little bigger image than the Mini -- actually close to the 6x7 gate you'd have with a 120 film magazine. Were you able to get the film plane to match?
And for another ten bucks, I can get an Instax Wide 300, which I've read can shoot all three packs...
Okay, quickly found a 3D printable adapter to shoot Square in a Wide camera.
And here's an adapter you can apparently buy (at least as of summer before last) that will let you shoot Square and Wide interchangeably in five models of Wide camera (with two different versions of the adapter).
There's also apparently an adapter for the Lomo'instant Square camera to shoot both Square and Mini packs, and after seeing it (just a door swap, it seems) I can see it ought to be possible to modify the door on a Wide to shoot Wide, Square, and Mini from the same camera (if you don't mind having to crop more and more off the right side of the finder for each step down). Potentially useful, though, in case your local shop is out of stock on the larger film, at least you can shoot something.
I have no connection with the product or the seller, but thought that it might make good use of all those 220 backs out there.
My goodness, these last two comments made me to take out the RB7, take the roll film adapter off, and place one of my wooden 2x3 film holders on the back.The plastic Fidelity holders I use need to have a little plastic ridge removed because it presses on the 'pod.' It is a simple modification.
Don't understand? Wooden door cut back a bit? Could you explain.I use the older wooden graphic holders with the wooden door cut back a bit with an exacto blade to clear the pod.
The Graftmatic back film holder that can contain 6 shots, has no felt on it, and have used this several times on the RB67 with no light leaks, perhaps we were just just lucky.
No, you most likely have it right.Or I might be misunderstanding how the light seal on a Graflok back works.
True, but sometimes we have a specific shot in mind, and want to try it out first, and just develop that one shot, not wanting to wait until we have shot the whole roll. Or the roll film backs are loaded with color and the image we see we feel would work out as a good B&W composition.I'm not sure I understand the advantage of using sheet film (very limited emulsion choices 2x3 size) on an RB over shooting 120. The RB mask means you'll get about the same image size,
I first started shooting Instax mini in my 2x3 Crown Grafic, as stated one has to make some modifications on the film holder. Liked the shots but they were so small, so made modification on a 3x4 film holder, and was able to use instax max on the 3x4 speed.and I can't think the Instax Mini pods will let a Grafmatic work.
The Graftmatic back film holder that can contain 6 shots, has no felt on it, and have used this several times on the RB67 with no light leaks, perhaps we were just just lucky.
Can you load instax film into a 2x3 Grafmatic and basically have an instant camera with multiple shots?
Probably not -- haven't tried it, haven't got a 2x3 Grafmatic (yet), but I do have three 4x5 Grafmatics, and I think Instax film is too thick for the Grafmatic to cycle correctly.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?