Rapid fixer -same solution ratio for film and print?

jay moussy

Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2019
Messages
1,314
Location
Eastern MA, USA
Format
Hybrid
Ilford guides seem to indicate that one can use either 1+4 or 1+9 dilutions for prints.
(1 to 4 being the recommendation for film)
EDIT: corrected to 1+4 and 1+9

Pros and cons with either ratios, for prints?
 
Last edited:

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,854
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Ilford guides seem to indicate that one can use either 1 to 4 or 1 to 9 dilutions for prints.
(1 to 4 being the recommendation for film)

Pros and cons with either ratios, for prints?
Well all I can say is that I have never used the 1+4 for prints but in over 15 years I have yet to see a problem with 1+9 for prints. I do use 1+4 for film and given this is a different ratio it follows that I never mix the two between film and prints. I simply use 1+4 for film because that is what the "book says"

I hope this helps

pentaxuser
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,695
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
1 + 4 with paper requires shorter fixing times, which leads to shorter wash times.
It is easier to maximize economy with 1 + 9.
1 + 9 probably makes more sense with RC papers, because the required wash times with RC are very short with either dilution.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,585
Location
Eugene, Oregon
Format
4x5 Format
Ilford promotes a fixing sequence using stronger fixer (1+4 or "film-strength") and shorter wash times for fiber-base paper. The thinking behind this is that the shorter fixing time keeps the fixer from soaking into the paper base, making washing easier, thus saving water and time. This is especially true if one uses a wash aid.

This regime works for Ilford papers and fixers, and when the fixing time can be kept to one minute. See here for the details: https://www.ilfordphoto.com/ilford-optimum-permanance-wash-sequence-fb-papers/ . If the fixing time exceeds the one-minute mark by much (20 or 30 more seconds), then the paper base becomes saturated and longer wash times are needed.

Many of us prefer to use longer fixing times with the weaker, 1+9 dilution for a number of reasons.

Personally, I find it difficult to ensure that my fixing time is not more than one minute. I often bleach prints locally, and have to return them to the fixer once or more times after the bleaching. Also, I use two-bath fixation, and keeping the time down to 30 seconds per bath, especially with larger prints and the longer drain times, is impractical. Using just one bath makes things easier, but reduces the fixer capacity to just 10 8x10s per liter if one wants to process for optimum permanence (see the Ilford tech sheet on Rapid Fixer for the information on this). With two-bath fixation, I can often more than double this capacity, especially if I can promote bath 2 to bath 1 a couple of times, and still have optimally-processed prints and not have a hectic time fixing my prints trying to keep the time down to 60 seconds.

Note also that the throughput capacity for fixers is not affected by the dilution, it is dependent on the amount of dissolved silver built up in the fixer. Therefore, the 1+9 dilution, especially with a two-bath regime, is inherently more economical.

My regime with Ilford Rapid Fixer 1+9 is 1.5-2 minutes per bath, selenium toner, 5-minute water rinse*, 10 minutes in a wash aid, and a final wash for a minimum of 60 minutes. I test regularly for residual silver and residual hypo and my prints pass the tests with flying colors.

*Note: I've been recently reminded that this intermediate wash step before the wash aid is very important and allows the wash aid to do its job much more effectively.

Hope this helps,

Doremus
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…