Ragged Branches on Emulsion-side

[giglaeoplexis]

I'm having difficulty figuring out what's going on here. I've searched the internet for similar issues but have come up empty. On only a few frames, on one reel of two developed simultaneously, I get these ragged, light gray branches. These are on the emulsion side of the negative.

All negatives with these "branches" are AristaEDU400 135-36, developed in Pyrocat-HD 1:1:100/Fixer 24. I've tried developing both at 70F and 80F with the same results. I thought the issue might be related to more consistent developing temperatures and tried a test roll at 80F. This roll showed no signs of the "branches".

This is the first time I've ever seen anything like this. When I began developing my own film in the 90s, I processed a few hundred rolls with D-76 at various dilutions and never came across this.

Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.

 

[Don_ih]

Static discharge? It looks both like it has to be and that it can't possibly be.

(edit) Looking at some samples online - static discharge seems to be what it is.

 

[giglaeoplexis]

Static discharge? It looks both like it has to be and that it can't possibly be.

It looks like lightning.... but it's only on a few frames and not the entire roll. I have no way of knowing which roll was on top, but the single roll I developed was in the bottom reel.

 

[Don_ih]

It looks like lightning.... but it's only on a few frames and not the entire roll. I have no way of knowing which roll was on top, but the single roll I developed was in the bottom reel.

The static happens when advancing the film, I think - if the conditions are correct. If you look at how the bolts all line up along one start point, which would roughly coincide with where the film was touching the film underneath in the supply spool (while the previous frame was shot) - the sparks shoot off as you advance the film. It's not that common.

 

[giglaeoplexis]

The static happens when advancing the film, I think - if the conditions are correct. If you look at how the bolts all line up along one start point, which would roughly coincide with where the film was touching the film underneath in the supply spool (while the previous frame was shot) - the sparks shoot off as you advance the film. It's not that common.

I've shot color in the same camera and have never had branches on the film. Is it possible the combination of film, developer, and/or fixer would result in something like this?

 

[Anon Ymous]

I've shot color in the same camera and have never had branches on the film. Is it possible the combination of film, developer, and/or fixer would result in something like this?

No. Humidity when shooting the film is probably a factor.

 

[giglaeoplexis]

I just found another post regarding this same exact phenomena. Don Heisz, you were right on the money. This film likely has no antistatic layer. So much for cheap film... https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/static-discharge-on-film-in-camera.158204/

 

[koraks]

This film likely has no antistatic layer.

I think technically speaking only cine film has an antistatic layer (remjet; also serves other purposes).

Very neat (if unintended) demonstration of the effect though! It goes nicely with the power lines, too.

 

[giglaeoplexis]

No. Humidity when shooting the film is probably a factor.

I think technically speaking only cine film has an antistatic layer (remjet; also serves other purposes).

Very neat (if unintended) demonstration of the effect though! It goes nicely with the power lines, too.

YEAH! It's very neat. But I need to find a solution! I have an idea it might be the film, though..... The emulsion of this AristaEDU is pretty thin. It's worth it to try a few rolls of HP5+ and my old standby, TRI-X. Dang it all to heck!

 

[snusmumriken]

Was this a home load from bulk? Static is not uncommon if you turn the handle too fast or pull adhesive tape off quickly.

 

[giglaeoplexis]

Was this a home load from bulk? Static is not uncommon if you turn the handle too fast or pull adhesive tape off quickly.

These are from a brick of pre-rolled 135 cassettes.

 

[Patrick Robert James]

I'm curious what camera you were using.

 

[MattKing]

I have an idea it might be the film, though..... The emulsion of this AristaEDU is pretty thin. It's worth it to try a few rolls of HP5+ and my old standby, TRI-X. Dang it all to heck!

It is likely that it has more to do with the nature of the film substrate than the emulsion.
What camera were you using, and was there a motor winder involved?

 

[Kino]

That's most certainly static discharge.

Cold, dry days exacerbate this, but it's pretty amazing you were able to get a discharge almost all the way across the web of the film! That's unusual!

Typically, we will see this on 35mm motion picture printers that run at around 100 feet per minute with a relative humidity of less than 20%.

 

[giglaeoplexis]

It is likely that it has more to do with the nature of the film substrate than the emulsion.
What camera were you using, and was there a motor winder involved?

The camera is a Nikon F2, no motor drive

 

[giglaeoplexis]

That's most certainly static discharge.

Cold, dry days exacerbate this, but it's pretty amazing you were able to get a discharge almost all the way across the web of the film! That's unusual!

Typically, we will see this on 35mm motion picture printers that run at around 100 feet per minute with a relative humidity of less than 20%.

I'm up in Arcata, CA, about an hour south of the Oregon Border. That image was taken a couple miles from the coast.

 

[giglaeoplexis]

I'm curious what camera you were using.

I'm using a Nikon F2

 

[Kino]

Could be a confectioning defect from the factory.

 

[giglaeoplexis]

I shot a couple rolls of XP2 and 1 roll of Kentmere 400 on my Mamiya Press Super 23 and had zero issues. The Kentmere 400 was processed in Pyrocat-HD at some random temperature. Tough to maintain a consistent temperature with just tap water. In the olden times, 30 years ago, when I'd develop using D-76 I'd use straight tap water and get the temperature close. The next step, I think, would be to try a different film, something more-pro.

 

[giglaeoplexis]

Could be a confectioning defect from the factory.

I was thinking this, as well. Occasionally there's a reason to use the more expensive film.

 

[koraks]

Arista Edu = Foma?

Yup.

 

[Ivo Stunga]

Static discharge. I like the effect, so I introduced in a couple of films with piezo lighter igniter.

Advance/load film slower to avoid this.

 

[250swb]

A typical pattern for alien abduction, they must have been hovering just over you and bagged a gopher instead.