RA4 chemicals for film?

Camel Rock

A
Camel Rock

  • 2
  • 0
  • 24
Wattle Creek Station

A
Wattle Creek Station

  • 4
  • 0
  • 34
Cole Run Falls

A
Cole Run Falls

  • 2
  • 2
  • 23
Clay Pike

A
Clay Pike

  • 4
  • 1
  • 25

Forum statistics

Threads
198,938
Messages
2,783,509
Members
99,751
Latest member
lyrarapax
Recent bookmarks
0

ricksplace

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
1,561
Location
Thunder Bay,
Format
Multi Format
Has enyone ever tried RA4 paper developer for (colour) films? There must be somebody who, like me, is curious enough to have tried it. If it worked, what time/temp/dilution did you use?
 

Nick Zentena

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
4,666
Location
Italia
Format
Multi Format
PE has posted that the developer in RA4 [CD3?] is bad for the dyes in the film. At least that's what I remember. I'm sure he has discussed the issue.
 

glbeas

Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2002
Messages
3,932
Location
Marietta, Ga. USA
Format
Multi Format
You would probably have issues with crossover and color balance as the layers would develop at a different speed ratio as with the C41 process. It's worth it for junk film just to see what happens, a different sort of 'cross process' so to speak. I know it works poorly with prints and C41, done that and got no Tee shirt for it.
 

srs5694

Member
Joined
May 18, 2005
Messages
2,718
Location
Woonsocket,
Format
35mm
The CD3 developer used in RA-4 is the same as the developer used in E-6, so in terms of the developer being "good" or "bad" for the film, I wouldn't expect it to be any different from cross-processing C-41 film in E-6 chemistry. (Of course, you'd get very different results.) That said, I've never tried this experiment. I certainly wouldn't expect archival results, but it might be worth trying just to see what you get.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Just FYI, the E6 color developer and the RA color developer use CD3, but the pH of the E6 developer is around 11 or 12 (I'm having a senior moment and cant remember offhand without looking at my notes). In addition, the E6 developer contains a lot of silver halide solvents. SO, E6 color developer used for paper gives foggy results, and RA developer used for E6 films gives low contrast and muddy dyes.

Now, C41 uses CD4 which is a lot more active than CD3. Therefore used for paper will give odd, high contrast results with crossover and oddball dye stability due to the nature of the dyes formed. RA used for C41 films will give low contrast images with odd colors.

OTOH, E6 <-> C41 cross processes work after a fashion. E6 film in C41 gives high contrast images with lots of crossover, and C41 films in E6 give low contrast orange slides.

Of them all (I've tried all) the E6 in C41 is the only combination to give interesting and usable results. The rest are pretty much flops, but then that is my opinion. They might be useful as an oddball art form.

PE
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom