Quick Question about pinhole size

EASmithV

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
1,984
Location
Virginia
Format
Large Format
My friend found a big piece of construction ducting laying around, and just for the hell of it, we're going to build a pinhole camera with a focal length of about 152cm. I looked at a pinhole size calculator, and is it true that my pinhole will be 17mm wide? I'm going to have it cover an 8x10 sheet of paper.
 

reellis67

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 10, 2005
Messages
1,885
Location
Central Flor
Format
4x5 Format
When I used the tool that I use to determine pinhole size, a focal length of 1520mm (152cm) requires a pinhole size of 1.64mm, which would be about f/925...

- Randy
 

DWThomas

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 13, 2006
Messages
4,611
Location
SE Pennsylvania
Format
Multi Format
1.7 mm sounds reasonable, confirmed via Pinhole Designer. Maybe a power of ten fell by the wayside with mm vs cm? f/894! You better include a lawn chair and a cooler of beverage with your photo gear!

DaveT
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,702
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format

1.45 mm if you're after sharpness and 1.75 mm if you're after resolution. Anything in-between will work fine as well.
 

keithwms

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
6,220
Location
Charlottesvi
Format
Multi Format
Your distinction between sharpness and resolution.... and why you'd recommend different aperture sizes to get one or the other. The way you wrote that, it implied to me that 1.45 would give better sharpness but inferior resolution, whereas 1.75 would do the opposite. I don't get that... unless you have some info about what spatial freqs are better transmitted at either extreme or such?
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,702
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format

Keith

Indeed, that is exactly what I meant.

Since you mentioned spacial frequency, I assume that you're familiar with MTFs. An MTF comparison between a pinhole size, optimized for the Airy disk, compared to one optimized for the Rayleigh criterion reveals the difference. If someone is after the optimum pinhole size, one must decide what to optimize it for. Our eyes have a clear preference for contrast over resolution, and therefore, the Airy disk is commonly preferred. However, the Raleigh criterion results in higher resolution at the cost of contrast and perceived sharpness.

Diffraction optics dictates that the pinhole is as large as possible to minimize light spreading, and geometric optics dictates that an ideal pinhole is as small as possible to optimize image clarity. Considering the Airy disc and the Rayleigh criterion leads to two theorems for an ideal pinhole diameter and suggests that there may be more than one right answer.

1. The smallest pinhole possible is based on the Airy disc to optimize image sharpness.

d = sqrt(2.44 * wave length * focal length)

2. The largest pinhole necessary satisfies the Rayleigh criterion to optimize image resolution.

d = sqrt(3.66 * wave length * focal length)

Again, the quest for the optimal pinhole diameter is generally fueled by the desire to create the sharpest pinhole image possible. Contrast and resolution are both aspects of sharpness, but human perception typically considers high-contrast images to be sharper than high-resolution images. Consequently, unless resolution is more important than perceived sharpness, my proposal for the optimal pinhole diameter is based on George Airy’s diffraction-limited disc.

I hope this explains it a bit better.
 

keithwms

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
6,220
Location
Charlottesvi
Format
Multi Format

Ah okay, thanks Ralph, I figured it was an MTF argument. Interesting. I was guessing that it was all a wash when one takes into account wavelength spread, but I will think about it some more. Interesting!
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…