Steve Goldstein
Subscriber
Mods - feel free to move it if you think it's better placed somewhere else.
One thing I've never seen mentioned in discussions of unsharp masking is the effect of source light divergence when making the mask. This depends on the focal length of the enlarging lens being used to make the mask, the height of the enlarger head when making the mask, and the focal length of the lens used to enlarge the masked negative.
If I want to make a mask, does it matter if I use an enlarging lens with a shorter or longer focal length when projecting light on the masking "easel"? Does enlarger head height matter? Does the anticipated degree of enlargement matter? I'm mainly using medium format (6x7) and 4x5 and almost always print 11x14 and 16x20, very rarely smaller and (so far) never larger.
Would it be better to use no lens at all and run the enlarger up high?
My 4x5 is equipped with a cold-light head. Does that make a difference?
Am I totally overthinking this?
One thing I've never seen mentioned in discussions of unsharp masking is the effect of source light divergence when making the mask. This depends on the focal length of the enlarging lens being used to make the mask, the height of the enlarger head when making the mask, and the focal length of the lens used to enlarge the masked negative.
If I want to make a mask, does it matter if I use an enlarging lens with a shorter or longer focal length when projecting light on the masking "easel"? Does enlarger head height matter? Does the anticipated degree of enlargement matter? I'm mainly using medium format (6x7) and 4x5 and almost always print 11x14 and 16x20, very rarely smaller and (so far) never larger.
Would it be better to use no lens at all and run the enlarger up high?
My 4x5 is equipped with a cold-light head. Does that make a difference?
Am I totally overthinking this?