Question for the chemists

Advertisements.jpg

H
Advertisements.jpg

  • 0
  • 1
  • 27
Sonatas XII-85 (Farms)

A
Sonatas XII-85 (Farms)

  • 2
  • 1
  • 50
Water Gods Sputum

H
Water Gods Sputum

  • 2
  • 0
  • 55
Cash

A
Cash

  • 7
  • 4
  • 143

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
200,290
Messages
2,805,621
Members
100,197
Latest member
EdwardLuke
Recent bookmarks
0

David Allen

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2008
Messages
991
Location
Berlin
Format
Med. Format RF
I have been using Barry Thornton's Two-Bath developer for more than a decade.

1 litre was always good for at least 15 films and kept for at least 6 months.

I have always used a pre-soak so that Bath A does not become full of the dye.

Recently, both myself and a former pupil have been experiencing Bath A turning a mid grey colour after only 4 - 5 films and after only a couple of months.

So, finally to my question, the only thing that has changed is that both our recent batches of Metol were not white but a light tan colour. Could this be the cause of the problem?

Many thanks for your help,

David.
www.dsallen.de
 

Randy Stewart

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2006
Messages
279
Format
Medium Format
I have been using Barry Thornton's Two-Bath developer for more than a decade.

1 litre was always good for at least 15 films and kept for at least 6 months.

I have always used a pre-soak so that Bath A does not become full of the dye.

Recently, both myself and a former pupil have been experiencing Bath A turning a mid grey colour after only 4 - 5 films and after only a couple of months.

So, finally to my question, the only thing that has changed is that both our recent batches of Metol were not white but a light tan colour. Could this be the cause of the problem?

Many thanks for your help,

David.

There are so many variables presented by your question that I do not think a reasonable answer can be made. In the end, the problem, if any, is whether you are getting the images you want. The color of the developer, if fresh, is probably irrelevant.

However, what is relevant is that you are misusing the developer. By the way it works (chemically), you do not pre-wash the film prior to development. This developer depends on the film emulsion absorbing a quantity of the first part of the developer, then going to the second part of the developer without any intervening wash. If you "pre-wash", you load the emulsion with water, which inhibits the intended infusion of the first developer.
 
OP
OP
David Allen

David Allen

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2008
Messages
991
Location
Berlin
Format
Med. Format RF
With freshly made developer we both get exactly the negatives that we expect. However, since we both received Metol that is not white but a light tan colour the capacity appears to have been dramatically reduced. Hence my question as to whether the light tan colour indicates that the Metol is not pure enough.

As to the question of pre-soaking, this is something that every photographer has a different opinion about. I have, over the past 40 years, always used a pre-soak with many different developers and always have achieved consistent results. Specifically with modern emulsions, a pre-soak is necessary for two-bath developers because the developer is reused many times and it would become full of the pink dye very quickly - and who would trust their films in such a discoloured developer? If pre-soaking the film was a 'misuse' of the developer, then I, and the many people that I have taught, would not have achieved highly consistent, predictable and high quality negatives for more than a decade.

I think that the key point in my original post is the nothing has changed except the colour of the latest batch of Metol.

Bests,

David.
www.dsallen.de
 

john_s

Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
2,176
Location
Melbourne, A
Format
Medium Format
How annoying for you. All I can suggest is another purchase of metol perhaps from a different supplier. Have you enquired of the supplier of the current batch of metol? (I have had to do this in the past and it resolved nothing, but you might be luckier).

I'm sure that the pre wash is not the problem. Bath A is a normal developer, not part of a split developer.
 

john_s

Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
2,176
Location
Melbourne, A
Format
Medium Format
David,
Did you discover what was going wrong with your Barry Thornton Two Bath?
 
OP
OP
David Allen

David Allen

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2008
Messages
991
Location
Berlin
Format
Med. Format RF
Yes I talked to several other photographers here in Germany who make their own developer and all had experienced the same problems with dramatically reduced capacity from the light tan coloured Metol from the same supplier. All said that it worked fine at first but then quickly discoloured to a point where they did not want to use it for fear of ruining their films.

One of the people I talked to was Wolfgang Moersch (https://www.moersch-photochemie.de/content/news) who makes and sells a wide range of interesting products. He had tried the discoloured developer and found that "the only directly visible disadvantage is the grey colour of the solution and a dark, uncomfortable precipitation at the bottom of the bottle. Such solutions are still effective, but I cannot guarantee that exactly the same densities will occur during film development" and this pretty much mirrored my own experience.

I then sourced some Metol from a supplier in Poland and that was white and the developer worked as expected and retained the capacity for 15 films and only had the expected slight discolouration by the last batch of films.

I then contacted my usually reliable and competitively priced chemical supplier (Fototechnik Suvatlar in Hamburg whose price list you can see here: http://moersch-photochemie.de/moersch/webroot/files/Preisliste_online_2018final.pdf) and they agreed that the light tan Metol was substandard and confirmed that they had, after I had purchased my last 50g of Metol, changed to another source.

They then supplied me with new Metol for free and this was white in colour as normal. Subsequently, my former pupil also contacted them and they also supplied him with new Metol free of charge. So heads up to Fototechnik Suvatlar for very good customer service.

Currently, my latest batch of Barry Thornton's Two-Bath has now been used for 8 rolls and remains, after nearly two months, pretty clear with only the usual slight change in colour.

Bests,

David.
www.dsallen.de
 
Last edited:

trendland

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Messages
3,398
Format
Medium Format
Yes I talked to several other photographers here in Germany who make their own developer and all had experienced the same problems with dramatically reduced capacity from the light tan coloured Metol from the same supplier. All said that it worked fine at first but then quickly discoloured to a point where they did not want to use it for fear of ruining their films.

One of the people I talked to was Wolfgang Moersch (https://www.moersch-photochemie.de/content/news) who makes and sells a wide range of interesting products. He had tried the discoloured developer and found that "the only directly visible disadvantage is the grey colour of the solution and a dark, uncomfortable precipitation at the bottom of the bottle. Such solutions are still effective, but I cannot guarantee that exactly the same densities will occur during film development" and this pretty much mirrored my own experience.

I then sourced some Metol from a supplier in Poland and that was white and the developer worked as expected and retained the capacity for 15 films and only had the expected slight discolouration by the last batch of films.

I then contacted my usually reliable and competitively priced chemical supplier (Fototechnik Suvatlar in Hamburg whose price list you can see here: http://moersch-photochemie.de/moersch/webroot/files/Preisliste_online_2018final.pdf) and they agreed that the light tan Metol was substandard and confirmed that they had, after I had purchased my last 50g of Metol, changed to another source.

They then supplied me with new Metol for free and this was white in colour as normal. Subsequently, my former pupil also contacted them and they also supplied him with new Metol free of charge. So heads up to Fototechnik Suvatlar for very good customer service.

Currently, my latest batch of Barry Thornton's Two-Bath has now been used for 8 rolls and remains, after nearly two months, pretty clear with only the usual slight change in colour.

Bests,

David.
www.dsallen.de
I am not so sure about the color of the powder !
s-l225.jpg
metol powder is loking that way!

But I also remember a seller a year ago who offered metol with a cast (brownish red) if I remember right!
s-l1600(3).jpg


hart to identify if it was the same from this here - it was a seller located in the "Ucraine"!

But I also remember I bought perceptol (Ilford) and it was originaly dated 1983, 1987, 1989!!
All of that metol parts had a cast ! But it worked perfect!

So it may be your powdered metol (with color cast) saw bad storage and is oxided!
But do you know how metol has to come properly in solution?

with regards
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom