Yes I talked to several other photographers here in Germany who make their own developer and all had experienced the same problems with dramatically reduced capacity from the light tan coloured Metol from the same supplier. All said that it worked fine at first but then quickly discoloured to a point where they did not want to use it for fear of ruining their films.
One of the people I talked to was Wolfgang Moersch (
https://www.moersch-photochemie.de/content/news) who makes and sells a wide range of interesting products. He had tried the discoloured developer and found that "the only directly visible disadvantage is the grey colour of the solution and a dark, uncomfortable precipitation at the bottom of the bottle. Such solutions are still effective, but I cannot guarantee that exactly the same densities will occur during film development" and this pretty much mirrored my own experience.
I then sourced some Metol from a supplier in Poland and that was white and the developer worked as expected and retained the capacity for 15 films and only had the expected slight discolouration by the last batch of films.
I then contacted my usually reliable and competitively priced chemical supplier (Fototechnik Suvatlar in Hamburg whose price list you can see here:
http://moersch-photochemie.de/moersch/webroot/files/Preisliste_online_2018final.pdf) and they agreed that the light tan Metol was substandard and confirmed that they had, after I had purchased my last 50g of Metol, changed to another source.
They then supplied me with new Metol for free and this was white in colour as normal. Subsequently, my former pupil also contacted them and they also supplied him with new Metol free of charge. So heads up to Fototechnik Suvatlar for very good customer service.
Currently, my latest batch of Barry Thornton's Two-Bath has now been used for 8 rolls and remains, after nearly two months, pretty clear with only the usual slight change in colour.
Bests,
David.
www.dsallen.de