• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Question about Tmax 400

The Chicken

A
The Chicken

  • 3
  • 4
  • 64
Amour - Paris

A
Amour - Paris

  • 1
  • 0
  • 73

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
203,241
Messages
2,851,911
Members
101,743
Latest member
Pablino
Recent bookmarks
0

Jimi and Jim and Janis

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
58
Location
Puerto Rico
Format
35mm
Kodak says that Tmax 400 can be pushed one stop without addtional developing time. So I can shoot half the roll in 400 and the rest in 800 iso and it gets developed fine? no? Thanks for reading
 
I haven't done it personally (yet) but I believe I have heard the same. Push processing (especially if processing yourself) is not hard.
 
you will be able to see that your asa800 exposures
will look a little "thinner" than the asa400 exposures
but you should be ok ..

have fun !
john
 
You lose some shadow detail if you underexpose the film by one stop, which is what you're doing if you shoot it at EI 800. The contrast between the middle values is still pretty good though because the film has a short toe and a relatively long straight line middle section to the characteristic curve.
 
Wirelessly posted (BBBold: BlackBerry9000/4.6.0.297 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/102 UP.Link/6.3.0.0.0)

Honestly, if you underexpose by one stop, it's no big whoop to add an extra 36" (HC110 DilB) to your dev time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi,

First, pushing is altering development to increase contrast. How you rate your film does not determine whether or not you are pushing. This only determines how you are exposing. Pushing refers to a development technique, not to a film rating. You cannot technically push without, er....pushing!

So, what Kodak is saying is simply that the film can easily survive one stop of underexposure without being pushed.

FWIW, most black and white films can do this as well. T-Max simply handles it a little better due to its inherently near-linear response to light. For my personal shooting, I think of T-Max as having a lot of the same uses as digital: Low contrast and/or low light scenes, where underexposure (often extreme underexposure) is unavoidable. This is where digital and T-Max really work best for what I shoot. (Of course, T-Max is more flexible and has more latitude, as does negative film in general, IMO.)

Your roll should be fine. I would not push it. It is more likely that you will make the shots at 400 harder to print by pushing than it would be to print the underexposed shots at 800, even with normal development. This is because it is generally easier and more "natural" looking to add contrast to a print using simple printing methods (such as contrast filters) than it is to lower contrast with the same methods.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom