I'll go against some of the other posts.
Yes, most 105 mm lenses will have inadequate coverage for 4x5, but this isn't always the case; in fact, some of the cheaper ones may do better than the Tessar and Heliar types. For instance, I have a 105/4.5 Agnar triplet (in a shutter, haven't looked at the shutter recently but it's not a top end one) that I've used successfully on my Speed Graphic and Graphic View. The key is to do two things: stop down well (most lenses with marginal coverage will improve some past f/16) and don't focus to infinity (also, if the lens is front-element focused, set it to its own infinity). With my Agnar, hyperfocal at f/16 is about twelve feet; if I focus at that distance, everything from six feet to infinity is "in focus" within depth of field. This focus setting moves the lens a few millimeters further from the film plane, which expands the image circle a little bit. The combination of these two things -- stopping down and focusing in a bit -- let my Agnar cover 4x5 with no visible vignetting and acceptable (to me) sharpness in the corners.
I have images from this lens, used this way, in which I can read a license plate a block away from the camera. It makes a nice cheap wide angle (I think I paid $10 for the totally hosed camera the lens came on).
Now, you get no movements, obviously -- and if you want to throw a foreground out of focus, you may need to spend money for a lens intended for large format. But for most landscapes and a lot of street photography (with fast film) on a press camera, this kind of lens will work.