- Joined
- Dec 18, 2010
- Messages
- 70
- Format
- Multi Format
I had an idea of how to use the Ink Pattern page, and wanted to know if anyone has used this approach, or whether I am barking up the wrong tree.
So here is the idea:
1) After establishing the exposure for Dmax, print the Ink Pattern page, and scan it in as per a step wedge.
2) Create a spreadsheet, and measure the density of each ink at all or a subset of points, (every 10% sounds good to me).
3) Create a curve "intuitively", and use the show curve function to display it.
4) Add the sum of inks from the spreadsheet at a series of points on the displayed curve.
a) Verify dmin by sum of inks at 100% .... Is the sum >= 100% (and not vastly over 100%). If yes, continue, else adjust curve.
b) Perform sum of inks from the spreadsheet for a series of points on the displayed curve. Adjust ink mix and gamma until a
reasonable fit is found.
Now print a step wedge and scan it to confirm the rough curve derived from the above process. If it is reasonably close, a number of step wedge iterations, equating to time and materials have been saved, and the non-linearization values can now be derived.
Anybody tried this approach? Was it useful or a waste of time?
Thanks,
Nick.
So here is the idea:
1) After establishing the exposure for Dmax, print the Ink Pattern page, and scan it in as per a step wedge.
2) Create a spreadsheet, and measure the density of each ink at all or a subset of points, (every 10% sounds good to me).
3) Create a curve "intuitively", and use the show curve function to display it.
4) Add the sum of inks from the spreadsheet at a series of points on the displayed curve.
a) Verify dmin by sum of inks at 100% .... Is the sum >= 100% (and not vastly over 100%). If yes, continue, else adjust curve.
b) Perform sum of inks from the spreadsheet for a series of points on the displayed curve. Adjust ink mix and gamma until a
reasonable fit is found.
Now print a step wedge and scan it to confirm the rough curve derived from the above process. If it is reasonably close, a number of step wedge iterations, equating to time and materials have been saved, and the non-linearization values can now be derived.
Anybody tried this approach? Was it useful or a waste of time?
Thanks,
Nick.
