• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Pyro vs. Ilfotec-HC/HC-110 ...

Which film developer is your favourite?


  • Total voters
    68
  • Poll closed .
Pyro has become used for either Pyrogallol or Pyrocatchenin based developers in recent years, and both have staining and tanning effects.

Ian
 
I 'changed over' to Pyrocat HD in my home darkroom after many years as "Pro" Technical/Scientific(and Board Certified "Biological Photographer) I have found it does not provide the same amount of 'stain' as other iterations of Pyro based developers... but I find that the grain 'edge' is both 'crisp and finer' but much less obvious 'staining' using continuous 'rotation' (in BTZS tubes) in a "Tupperware' waterbath.

Ken
 
I think it depends on the film. But I have never tried HC so cannot make the comparison.
 


I can print the same negative processed in Pyrocat-HD in carbon, Kallitype, or silver gelatin. I can't do that with Xtol or any other conventional developer. Also, semi-stand in Pyrocat-HD is superior than any conventional developer that I have used...
 
It's also very economical when mixed from scratch.

Pyrocat HD iS now the only film developer now 'in use' in my basement darkroom... even thought I have Lots of HC110
and D76 I'd be quite happy to 'give away' for the cost of shipping

Ken