• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Pyro vs. Ilfotec-HC/HC-110 ...

Which film developer is your favourite?


  • Total voters
    68
  • Poll closed .

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,409
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
Pyro has become used for either Pyrogallol or Pyrocatchenin based developers in recent years, and both have staining and tanning effects.

Ian
 

KenS

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
941
Location
Lethbridge, S. Alberta ,
Format
Multi Format
I 'changed over' to Pyrocat HD in my home darkroom after many years as "Pro" Technical/Scientific(and Board Certified "Biological Photographer) I have found it does not provide the same amount of 'stain' as other iterations of Pyro based developers... but I find that the grain 'edge' is both 'crisp and finer' but much less obvious 'staining' using continuous 'rotation' (in BTZS tubes) in a "Tupperware' waterbath.

Ken
 

1kgcoffee

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 19, 2017
Messages
500
Location
Calgary
Format
Medium Format
I think it depends on the film. But I have never tried HC so cannot make the comparison.
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
12,904
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format


I can print the same negative processed in Pyrocat-HD in carbon, Kallitype, or silver gelatin. I can't do that with Xtol or any other conventional developer. Also, semi-stand in Pyrocat-HD is superior than any conventional developer that I have used...
 

KenS

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
941
Location
Lethbridge, S. Alberta ,
Format
Multi Format
It's also very economical when mixed from scratch.

Pyrocat HD iS now the only film developer now 'in use' in my basement darkroom... even thought I have Lots of HC110
and D76 I'd be quite happy to 'give away' for the cost of shipping

Ken