• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Pyro and 35mm?

schlger

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 1, 2007
Messages
66
Format
Multi Format
I am very pleased with TMY-2 35mm in PMK. It gives in my opinion the best combination of tonality, grain and sharpness. But I had no success with TMZ 3200 because the level of general fog and stain was ways to high. Do you have an advice for staining developers with this film or with Delta 3200? Did anyone test high speed films with the new Max Pyro?

Gerhard
 

edtbjon

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
391
Format
Medium Format
My own results with various films in PMK, Rollo Pyro and Pyrocat HD usually gives the lowest fog+base by far with Pyrocat HD. That is the one which I will try for my rolls of out-dated TMZ to see if I can get anything decent out of them. (I'm not trying to set a new world record for film speed as I usually rate TMZ at say 1000 ISO or so.)

//Björn
 

schlger

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 1, 2007
Messages
66
Format
Multi Format
Hell Björn,

How long do you develope TMZ in Pyrocat HD?
I once compared Pyrocat HD with PMK in 4x5 and found, that it rendered light midtones with better contrast / separation than PMK but shadows were darker at the same time. In 35mm with the old TMY, I had the impression, that grain was more pronounced with Pyrocat HD. Can I expect negatives with clear borders from the combination Pyrocat HD and TMZ?
Are there advantages grain, speed and base fog wise from Rollo Pyro over PMK with TMZ?

Thanks a lot
Gerhard
 

mikebarger

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 16, 2005
Messages
1,937
Location
ottawa kansas
Format
Multi Format
While I haven't used Acros I have had very good luck with 35mm Tri-x in 510 pyro.

Mike
 

leoking801

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 17, 2004
Messages
3
Wd2d pyro

Hi,
I wonder if you could please help me with the formula and further information
on Wd2d pyro for 35mm. I have tried to access Petersons Photographic
for the article you mentioned but have had difficulty finding it.

I am a PMK pyro user with Ilfords F.P.4+, VC. RC. paper - Durst condensor
enlarger and small tank development.

I would value your assistance and advice.

Regards

Leo King, Australia.
leoking801@hotmail.com

 
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,671
Location
Eugene, Oregon
Format
4x5 Format
WD2D Formula

Leo,

Here is the WD2D formula FYI:

Wimberley WD2D

Stock Solution A

Water (100° F or 38° C) 400 ml

Metol 1.5 g

Sodium bisulfite, anhydrous 5 g

Pyrogallol 15 g

Water to make 500 ml


Stock Solution B

Water 400 ml

Sodium carbonate, monohydrated 22 g

Water to make 500 ml

For use, add 20ml A and 20ml B to 400ml water. To adjust contrast, vary the amount of solution B — more B gives higher contrast, less B decreases contrast. The original formula contained benzotriazole, but this was later eliminated to increase contrast and reduce development times.

Hope this helps,

Doremus Scudder
 

nworth

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
2,228
Location
Los Alamos,
Format
Multi Format
The traditional reason for shunning pyro with 35mm films was that the pyro developers were not fine grain developers. High sulfite developers like undiluted D-76 and D-23 produced finer grain and more acceptable images with the films available before about 1965. With modern films there is less of a problem with grain and blocking up, and pyro developers become more acceptable. PMK and its modern kin in particular have a lower pH than traditional pyro formulas and produce fine results with modern miniature films, I understand. I have used pyro-triethanolamine developer, an older non-staining pyro developer, with 35 mm and got excellent results.