Pushing Tri-X 400

The Bank

A
The Bank

  • 0
  • 1
  • 0
Kildare

A
Kildare

  • 0
  • 0
  • 275
Sonatas XII-27 (Homes)

A
Sonatas XII-27 (Homes)

  • 0
  • 1
  • 340
From the Garden

D
From the Garden

  • 1
  • 0
  • 958
Kildare

A
Kildare

  • 8
  • 2
  • 1K

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,314
Messages
2,789,518
Members
99,868
Latest member
Pandazone
Recent bookmarks
0

Silverpixels5

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2003
Messages
594
Location
Houston, TX
Format
Multi Format
I have a roll of tri-x 400 in 35mm that I would like to push one, two, or possibly 3 stops. The problem is that I need suggestions on what to develop it in w/o 1) having to buy anything, and 2) it coming out looking like crap. I've gone through the forums and most people seem to say diafine or xtol...neither of which i have. My current chemistry inventory is fx39, rodinal, gamma plus, and a multitude of bulk chemicals. Thanks for any suggestions!
 

kaiyen

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
330
Location
bay area, ca
Format
Multi Format
You can get out to 1600 in Rodinal with results that are similar to Microphen, a developer much more well known for its ability to push. I'm willing to bet you could get to 3200, too, but I haven't scanned those yet to see how my test went. These won't look awesome, but they'll be printable.

EI 800 Rodinal 1+50 20:00 60s initial + 10s every 3 minutes
EI 1600, Rodinal 1+50 22:00 60s initial, 10s every 3 minutes

You'll notice that there isn't much difference between the two. I discovered that the reduced agitation controlled the highlights pretty well in both cases. The difference, therefore, was shadow detail. 800 still looked quite good. 1600 is clearly pushed.

My times are for my scanner, so that's kind of like a condenser enlarger.

allan
 

Bob Carnie

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
7,735
Location
toronto
Format
Med. Format RF
I would recommed push 2 stop with Microphen, we do this combo all the time with good results
 

Tom Hoskinson

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
3,867
Location
Southern Cal
Format
Multi Format
Silverpixels5 said:
I have a roll of tri-x 400 in 35mm that I would like to push one, two, or possibly 3 stops. The problem is that I need suggestions on what to develop it in w/o 1) having to buy anything, and 2) it coming out looking like crap. I've gone through the forums and most people seem to say diafine or xtol...neither of which i have. My current chemistry inventory is fx39, rodinal, gamma plus, and a multitude of bulk chemicals. Thanks for any suggestions!

Since you have bulk chemicals, I suggest you take a look in the APUG Chemistry Recipes section. Look for the RAF Metol-Pyro Recipe and the ASA 3200 results for Tri-X:

(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
 

df cardwell

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
3,357
Location
Dearborn,Mic
Format
Multi Format
Why do you need to 'push' ?

Are the shadows underexposed, the midtones, what ? If you can describe the scene, the problem, and what you want, the answer will take care of itself.

Reason being, you will alter part of the curve and sacrifice the rest.

FX-39 can increase the lower midtones and shadows a bit, the midtones a lot, and the highlights not much. It would be my first choice for simple underexposure. You would extend the time and reduce the agitation. The same method would work with Rodinal, but Rodinal has about a stop less natural shadow speed. Microphen will build density in the highlights, and make for a starchy look.

Whatever you choose, shoot a test roll, trying hard to replicate the scene, and develop strips to fine tune the image.
 
OP
OP
Silverpixels5

Silverpixels5

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2003
Messages
594
Location
Houston, TX
Format
Multi Format
The scene is pretty much 'low light, hand-held' situations. Mainly people. Grain isn't too much of a concern, although less is better. I'm more concerned with sharpness and tone. These are just personal snapshots, that will probably never be printed larger than 4x6 or 5x7.
 

reellis67

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 10, 2005
Messages
1,885
Location
Central Flor
Format
4x5 Format
With Diafine, Tri-X can be rated to 1200 ~ 1600 without the effects of pushing. I use it at 1200 with nice results. Diafine doesn't do well in flat light, but other than that, it gives nice results with Tri-X.

- Randy
 

titrisol

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
2,071
Location
UIO/ RDU / RTM/ POZ / GRU
Format
Multi Format
from the ones you have fx-39 will probably be the best bet.
Since normal time (400) is 8 minutes, so 14 min should do it
 

fhovie

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2003
Messages
1,250
Location
Powell Wyoming
Format
Large Format
XTOL 11 min 45 sec at 68F 5 sec agitation every 30 sec - low grain - good contrast - you will be able to enlarge them greatly if you like. TRI X at 1600 - I do this all the time.
 

df cardwell

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
3,357
Location
Dearborn,Mic
Format
Multi Format
If you're printing them yourself, you can make life easier by using fiber paper and 'soft ' developer like Selectol Soft, or mix Ansco 120 from scratch. 'Pushing' usually means driving the shadows up the curve, and the highlights go up as well. A long scale paer developer helps you get things back to appearing normal.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom