• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Pushing Acros

Valencia

A
Valencia

  • 2
  • 1
  • 64
Tied to the dock

D
Tied to the dock

  • 4
  • 0
  • 98

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
203,096
Messages
2,849,762
Members
101,664
Latest member
logan.perrin
Recent bookmarks
0

BetterSense

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 16, 2008
Messages
3,151
Location
North Caroli
Format
35mm
I just got back from vacation to find that my XA was loaded with Acros 100 instead of Tri-X 400 like I thought.

Does anyone have any times/temps for pushing Acros? I have Xtol, HC110, Diafine, and Dektol.
 
For Xtol, I've done 1+1 @ 13 for lower contrast and the same @ 16 for higher. Worked well.

I made the same mistake whence I though I had Neopan 400 in there instead. It should be fine.
 
If I remember right Thomas Bertilsson likes to uses Acros 100 at EI 400 for portraits. If he doesn't jump in here...PM him. Thomas uses X-tol also and his numbers may match above. If so, you're going to be in good company.

Jim
 
I've had luck pushing Across to EI 200 and developing in Xtol 1:1 for 14 minutes. This was in overcast lighting and is the most I would consider pushing the film without extreme developing techniques. I couldn't imagine the shadow detail i would lose in contrasty lighting. But for flat lighting it was great! Here's an example...
 

Attachments

  • boats, laurel lake 5-13-11.jpg
    boats, laurel lake 5-13-11.jpg
    259.9 KB · Views: 136
As Gim mentioned, the subject has been up for discussion before. I enclose a link to the descriptions given by Thomas Bertilsson . Good luck !

Karl-Gustaf

(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
 
Based on admittedly limited experience, Diafine should also do a reasonable job for you. I've shot Acros at 250 and 320 and developed in Diafine, and the results weren't too bad at all. Diafine should help keep the contrast manageable.

As Michael said though, a test roll (under similar lighting if possible) is the safest bet.
 
I went ahead with 16 minutes, agitation every 5 minutes. The roll is junk, and development had nothing to do with it. I thought there was Tri-X in there, and I'm not averse to underexposing that by a stop if I need to, so Acros didn't stand a chance. There may be one or two salvageable images.

Moral: Don't underexpose your film by 2 stops+ stops.
 
Sorry about your bad luck. Moral... be very very certain... if in doubt... overexpose rather than underexpose...
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom