I agree with those who said a Nikon F100. You have a larger amount of lenses available than Canon (including MF lenses) and it is much better constructed and sealed against weather.
Why is that? Your camera must not have good autofocus then or you are losing focus as you press the shutter. Maybe its a film camera problem, dunno. But on my 5D Mark III my focus hit-rate is 99% on wide open prime lenses. That camera is another beast thoughThe vast majority of my out of focus shots come from cameras with auto-focus
just sayin'.............
It just happened this weekend that a sudden flock of seagulls was giving me an excellent opportunity for some in-flight photos. I forgot that the little Pentax 110 I had with me was autofocus. I'm pretty sure you can guess why they were mostly out of focus. lolWhy is that? Your camera must not have good autofocus then or you are losing focus as you press the shutter. Maybe its a film camera problem, dunno. But on my 5D Mark III my focus hit-rate is 99% on wide open prime lenses. That camera is another beast though
Okay guys thanks for the help. I am taking either the EOS-3 or the Nikon F100 into consideration. Would love to of course pick the better option of the two. I dont mind Nikon though would love to save money on this.
Here's a shallow depth-of-field F100 portrait on flickr I loved, does anyone know what lens would this be? And what the Canon equivalent is?
Here's a shallow depth-of-field F100 portrait on flickr I loved, does anyone know what lens would this be? And what the Canon equivalent is?
I love how op states he has canon lenses, and everyone here is voting Nikon - get the 1v or 3, esp if you dont wanna buy more lens
The vast majority of my out of focus shots come from cameras with auto-focus
just sayin'.............
I love how op states he has canon lenses, and everyone here is voting Nikon ...
LOLThe proper term is Operator Assisted Failure [OAF].
The Nikon F100 was the best 35mm slr that Nikon made feature-wise in an electronic camera. Some do find fault with it because the plastic back can be weak, but I never had a problem with the camera having a plastic body.
Dumb question regarding EOS 3 vs F100:
I am seeing a lot of beautiful portraits made with the F100 online, example and example
Yet for some reason all the portraits I see with the EOS 3 dont look quite as good (not to my eye anyway). But a 50mm 1.4 on either camera should be able to pull identical pictures right (with the exception of some small grain changes or something)? Would the Nikkor lenses have vastly different color?
Because Canon markets(ed) heavily to sports photographers, and Nikon markets(ed) heavily to portrait and wedding photographers.I can understand that. Any reason why on other forums like to consider the Canon more of a sports camera and the Nikon more of a portrait/wedding camera?
Dumb question regarding EOS 3 vs F100:
I am seeing a lot of beautiful portraits made with the F100 online, example and example
Yet for some reason all the portraits I see with the EOS 3 dont look quite as good (not to my eye anyway). But a 50mm 1.4 on either camera should be able to pull identical pictures right (with the exception of some small grain changes or something)? Would the Nikkor lenses have vastly different color?
I can understand that. Any reason why on other forums like to consider the Canon more of a sports camera and the Nikon more of a portrait/wedding camera?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?