+1 blocking sidewalks and taking up large play areas of parks. This is not an easy problem to solve but everyone even the homeless cannot just camp anywhere.
Title updated.
This thread has gotten a few reports as political. We generally allow political discussions that relate narrowly to photography, like discussions of permission to photograph in public spaces or the regulation of photographic chemicals. This is partially relevant, because it has to do with the way that some landscape photographers work, partially not.
If the thread can stay on topic which isn’t irrelevant to landscape photography and if it remains civilized, then it can stay. If it turns into a brawl about universal rights, then it’s headed for The Soapbox.
+1 blocking sidewalks and taking up large play areas of parks. This is not an easy problem to solve but everyone even the homeless cannot just camp anywhere.
In Germany camping outside places designated for camping is not legal, and has been so for decades. At best one may stay to regain fitness to drive further.
In Germany camping outside places designated for camping is not legal, and has been so for decades. At best one may stay to regain fitness to drive further.
I expect that your perceptions of the law in Germany are influenced by the relative amount of available space you have in New Mexico.Wow! What a country.
Under the proposed new U.K law , it would be fine for me to drive my van onto a public car park , or onto any common land and park up overnight ( as long as overnight parking is permitted or I could get a parking ticket ) , as long as I set up a tent next to it to sleep in , rather than in the van itself , but I cant drive to the middle of nowhere , miles away from anyone else and sleep in it for a few hours until the sun comes up !
Where's the logic ?
Title updated.
This thread has gotten a few reports as political. We generally allow political discussions that relate narrowly to photography, like discussions of permission to photograph in public spaces or the regulation of photographic chemicals. This is partially relevant, because it has to do with the way that some landscape photographers work, partially not.
If the thread can stay on topic which isn’t irrelevant to landscape photography and if it remains civilized, then it can stay. If it turns into a brawl about universal rights, then it’s headed for The Soapbox.
Neither do I see the logic in that. Neither do I understand why such new law is needed to counter protesters camping on private property, as legislation on trespassing already should be an effective legal means for such.
Anyway, you already gave the solution: sleep in a tent next to your van. But as with any tent I see the even lesser protection from unfriendly persons than in a camper, let aside the weather aspect.
Are you no longer allowed to camp in designated campsites? I can understand not allowing camping by the side of the road. If you tried camping on my private property, I’d run you off. Neither of the links you provided link to the text of the law so I don’t know what it says. I think the petition is just to eliminate forfeiting the vehicle as a penalty, at least that is what I initially saw. I can’t get back into the petition because I live in the US.
What the OP will get is opinions from members, the vast majority of whom have no direct ownership of the subject for the simple reason they live outside of England and Wales. If it was intended as a topic for discussion for all on Photrio that's fine but if it is to harness active support for a review of the proposed legislation from those members resident in England and Wales then I'd have thought the numbers on Photrio, even assuming 100% support, is so small as to make little or no difference
The OP or others affected by this legislation may be using methods such as the petitioning site Change.org in which case fine but frankly the practical help from Photrio is, based on what I have said above, very little
This thread's discussion which inevitably ends up as being on the rights and wrongs of "freedom" and how it is defined by countries, philosophies etc is otherwise bound to turn political as it already has, and may as well be relegated to the Soapbox now or so it seems to me
We could all express an opinion without any opinions being challenged, of course, and that would prevent it entering the Soapbox but does that constitute a thread as we'd normally define what a thread is?
Best of luck in keeping it out of the Soapbox.
pentaxuser
What the OP will get is opinions from members, the vast majority of whom have no direct ownership of the subject for the simple reason they live outside of England and Wales. If it was intended as a topic for discussion for all on Photrio that's fine but if it is to harness active support for a review of the proposed legislation from those members resident in England and Wales then I'd have thought the numbers on Photrio, even assuming 100% support, is so small as to make little or no difference
The OP or others affected by this legislation may be using methods such as the petitioning site Change.org in which case fine but frankly the practical help from Photrio is, based on what I have said above, very little
This thread's discussion which inevitably ends up as being on the rights and wrongs of "freedom" and how it is defined by countries, philosophies etc is otherwise bound to turn political as it already has, and may as well be relegated to the Soapbox now or so it seems to me
We could all express an opinion without any opinions being challenged, of course, and that would prevent it entering the Soapbox but does that constitute a thread as we'd normally define what a thread is?
Best of luck in keeping it out of the Soapbox.
pentaxuser
Union Jack and bangers?There is only one definition of freedom. And it's Red White And Blue and smells of hotdogs.
Union Jack and bangers?
That's great but I see no sign that this thread reflects those aims in terms of the responses received. It appears to have become good knock about fun between some members who are unaffected by said legislation. However, as I said, the best of luck in promoting the message to those who will be affectedIt was neither a debate nor discussion .
I've posted this to raise awareness with fellow U.K photographers who travel around either in cars or campervans and wild camp , so they are near where they want to be in the morning for the golden hour , specifically those that travel in campervans as it potentially effects them most .
It does however erode at peoples rights until they longer have them .
There is only one definition of freedom. And it's Red White And Blue and smells of hotdogs.
That's great but I see no sign that this thread reflects those aims in terms of the responses received. It appears to have become good knock about fun between some members who are unaffected by said legislation. However, as I said, the best of luck in promoting the message to those who will be affected
pentaxuser
They might try take my freedom off me , but it'll be a fight to the death if they try take my fish and chips away from me !
Vinegar on french fries...Why?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?