• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Processing Sheet Film: Deep Tank, Tray, Daylight Tank?

brofkand

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 9, 2008
Messages
598
Location
North Carolina
Format
Digital
How do you process your sheet film? In school we used stainless steel tanks that held a gallon of chemistry IIRC. We ran replenished D-76.

Now that I have a 4x5 camera, obviously how I'll process the film has crossed my mind. I'm inclined to get deep tanks since I'm used to that method, but I was wondering what others use. Obviously that requires a darkroom, which I have access to at the local art gallery. I have emailed the darkroom manager to ask if they have any 4x5 processing equipment, but I'm thinking the answer is no. The stainless deep tanks are expensive and I can't even find the hangers.

I've heard of the Taco method of processing 4x5 film in a Patterson tank, but I don't own a Patterson tank (my professor in photo 1 said plastic tanks are not compatible with professional darkroom procedures so I gave it away). Not really interested in buying another one either; I have 1, 2, and 4 roll stainless tanks (Nikor style with 35mm and 120 reels).

I've seen daylight tanks, the Combi Plan and Yankee. Are they any better or worse than deep-tank dip and dunk? How about tray processing; that seems to be a good option as well. I feel sure the communal darkroom has 5x7 trays.

Any preferred methods? Anything I should steer clear of?
 

mwdake

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 25, 2007
Messages
794
Location
CO, USA
Format
Multi Format
A good an inexpensive alternative is find a Unicolor 8x10 drum as you can process 4x5 film in it.

http://www.largeformatphotography.info/unicolor/

I'd stay away from the Yankee tanks they use a lot of chemistry and it is not easy to agitate the film.

I'm sure you will gets lots of other worthwhile answers such as use trays, Jobo tanks etc.

Interesting what your professor said, maybe that is why he is a professor. Too bad I have been using plastic tanks for 40 years but I'm not a professional.
 
OP
OP

brofkand

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 9, 2008
Messages
598
Location
North Carolina
Format
Digital
Professors are very good at turning their opinion into fact. Whether or not plastic tanks are compatible with a professional darkroom I can't say for sure, but I know a lot of people use them and love them.

I am perfectly happy with my stainless steel tanks. I suppose my professor said that because of the belief (perhaps unfounded) that plastic tanks can leech chemistry and ruin film after some time. They also fall and crack (and leak when they crack) so maybe that's the reason, especially in a high-volume university setting. We went through at least 5 gallons of D-76 a week.
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
plastic tanks are plenty professional,
they don't transfer the heat from your hands into
the developer as much ... maybe your prof
had a bad experience with plastic and he is not
really telling you the real "why ...

i learned large format processing with deep tanks
they held 3.5 gallons ( i think ) we used dk50 + replenished with dk50R.
i used to process 15-20 5x7 sheets at once ... fun times.
later i bought armloads of hangers ( 4x5 ) and little stainless tanks
( i think i got them from columbus camera group back in like 1989 )
shutterbug was king back then ... i later used 3.5 quart tupperware containers
they fit 4x5 hanger perfectly ... and they were cheap !
i fell out of love with hangers when i had a bad one or 3 that messed with my film.
i couldn't ID which one was which ( maybe they took turns ? ) so i became a tray process convert.
it takes a little practice but tray processing is the simplest way there is.
some only process 1 or 2 or 4 or 8 sheets at at time, but i regularly process between 15 and 40 sheets of film
and have had trouble ( a scratch ? ) maybe 4 times in thousands of sheets.
the downside is that it is a constant shuffle, but it is worth the trouble.

good luck !
john
 

walbergb

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
429
Location
Brandon, Man
Format
Multi Format
I posted this on another thread once upon a time:

After unsuccessfully trying shuffling negatives in a tray, I modified an 8x10 tray by cutting 2x2"x1/8" ABS pipe cut in half (I'm sure 1 1/2" pipe would work just as well) using a miter saw to produce 4x1/8" half rings and gluing them to the bottom of the tray using Superglue to create 4 "chambers."

Cost me nothing but my time and works like a charm. The same tray can be used for each step, and I never handle the negatives. I set out all my chemicals in order on my right including water for a water bath; tray sits in a water jacket (room temperature is too high) in front of me pouring spout at top left; I empty the chemicals to my left: water bath & developer down the drain and the others into the containers I poured them from. 450-500ml of developer ensures that the sheets are covered. I use intermittent agitation: 60 seconds agitation and 10 out of every 60 seconds until the time is up.

Let me add that the "dots" you see are tiny drops from a hot-glue gun; just enough to keep the sheets off the bottom of the tray (the hot glue also works for the dividers). I never have to worry about the sheets falling out of the tray; just be careful (read: don't turn the damn thing upside down). I also use different shaped containers for the reusable chemicals (stop, fix, & hca) so I don't get mixed up, although by the time I get to the hca, I can turn the lights on. I suppose a larger tray would allow more sheets, but 4 at a time is good for me. I tested sheets exposed for Zones II, V, & VII (part of my film testing procedure) and found very little difference in density (as measured by a densitometer) around the edges as compared to the middle. It didn't matter if I was processing 2, 3, or 4 sheets at a time. Conclusion: even development across the film.

 

Nige

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 8, 2002
Messages
2,329
Format
Multi Format
any chance of a bigger picture?
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,715
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
I got a couple of Unicolor motor driven drum rollers, for five bucks and both are in good working order.

8x10 drums can be had for chop change, and voila - you have a perfect continuous motor driven system. I used to do four sheets of 4x5, and now do two sheets of 5x7 at a time. Perfectly even results every time. I love this method.
 

Ken Nadvornick

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 18, 2005
Messages
4,943
Location
Monroe, WA, USA
Format
Multi Format
any chance of a bigger picture?

Click on the image in (there was a url link here which no longer exists)...

Ken
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid

thomas

i also have a unicolor drums and the little rubber thing to process multiple sheets ( and a handful of replacement gaskets )
but even with the drum working correctly, and putting the correct amount of developer &c in the drum .. unless you
seal he ends with caulk the drums leaks chemistry out.

i know the vasoline on the gasket thing, and i have read greywolf's article on the large format site but never had the heart to fully seal mine ...

how do you get yours not to leak ?


thanks !
john
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,715
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
Hi John,

A couple of my tanks don't leak at all, and I have one that leaks marginally. The one that leaks a bit I just fold up a paper towel and lay it on the counter top underneath the cap of the tank. Just to be extra safe I put the roller base in a tray; I don't want chemistry all over the darkroom.

The best tanks I have tried for rotary are the Chromega ones. Those never leak. The Unicolor proprietary ones are nowhere near as good.

Once I did receive a Unicolor tank that has electric tape wrapped around the opening of the tank in hope of improving the seal, but it didn't work. I've heard of some people using wide electric tape, and wrapping it around the tank right where the tank and the cap come together, after the tank is closed, and that works pretty well.
In an 8x10 tank I've also noticed that anything more than 400ml of chemistry will overflow the tank and leak back out where chemistry is poured in.

Not much help, but I hope you can find some of those Chromega tanks for a buck or two. Those are great.

- Thomas

 

Terry Christian

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 2, 2011
Messages
693
Location
Memphis, TN
Format
35mm
To those using Unicolor drums:
What do you use to separate the sheets in the drum? I'm missing the little rubber dividers. I couldn't find clothes hanger clips as in the LF article, and I tried using small spring clamps, but they still allow the sheets to slide against each other during development.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,715
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
I use the original rubber dividers, but once received a drum that had a piece of pencil eraser cut to the same shape, and that seemed to work really well too.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
10,133
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
For just a few sheets I use a Bressler 5X7 drum, for 4 or sheets more I use tanks, I have old set of smaller "color" tanks that only use about 32 oz and will take up to 5 hangers. For larger funs I use Kodak tanks.
 

mwdake

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 25, 2007
Messages
794
Location
CO, USA
Format
Multi Format
My Unicolor tank used to leak until I got a couple more and some gaskets.
What I used to do was put a developing tray on the counter, put a few paper towels in the bottom of it then put the whole roller and tank in to the tray. It didn't leak much and the paper towels made the clean up easy.
 

Mainecoonmaniac

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
6,297
Format
Multi Format
How about this?
Dead Link Removed
 

Ken Nadvornick

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 18, 2005
Messages
4,943
Location
Monroe, WA, USA
Format
Multi Format
That guy is missing the entire top cover piece on the cage. That's why it's so inexpensive. And why no one will bite.

Ken
 

TareqPhoto

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
1,171
Location
Ajman - UAE
Format
Multi Format
I tested trays in my bathroom[in the dark] and it was painful for me or say uncomfortable, so i skipped this method.
I have BTZS tubes but didn't use them yet, i have also HB Combiplan tank and this one is also setting in the box waiting, i just bought Mod54 by a friend who brought it from England[his country], i am going to use Mod54 first because i like the tanks method, and i have Paterson multi-reel 3 one that can accommodate 4x5 perfectly with Mod54, later i may give the tubes a try, the Combiplan will be just as a backup if i may go to run many sheets at once, but i bought it because it wasn't that much expensive and i didn't read much about it and wanted to have it before it is gone or discontinued for any reason.
 

Mainecoonmaniac

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
6,297
Format
Multi Format
That's why the description is so scant

That guy is missing the entire top cover piece on the cage. That's why it's so inexpensive. And why no one will bite.

Caveat Emptor

Sorry for the bum recommendation
 

Discoman

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 17, 2011
Messages
123
Format
Large Format
I just use a daylight tank for 4x5. I do try and save and replenish the developer from it, as it is kinda pricey to dump the tank down the drain.
We had stainless tanks at my school, but each tank had the fun part where only one lid would fit each of the seemingly identical tanks correctly. And then each lid had only one smaller cover (for pouring in the chemicals, I don't know the technical name) that fit properly. Yeah, that wasn't very fun.
I would suggest a drum for processing, actually. Some hold the film on the side of the drum, so you don't need as much chemicals to process a batch as a daylight tank does, as daylight tanks hold film vertically, and if you have one sheet or twelve, you need a full tank.
Now, if you wanted to do something a bit more advanced, I would suggest getting one of those little tabletop drum processors, as you could probably get some color work done with them.
 

Leigh B

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 17, 2011
Messages
2,059
Location
Maryland, USA
Format
Multi Format
I very much prefer Diafine developer for tray processing due to its insensitivity to variation in time and/or temperature.
It gives great results with all b&w films.

All of my 8x10 and some 4x5 is done in trays using Diafine. Works great, emulsion DOWN as AA and others have suggested.
I use the dimple-bottom Cescolite trays, which are no longer in production but can be found used.

HTH

- Leigh
 

P C Headland

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 24, 2005
Messages
842
Location
New Zealand
Format
Multi Format
I started using the taco method for multiple 4x5 and 9x12cm sheets, or if I did one sheet, I'd just slide it into the tank emulsion side in and roll the tank. Worked well enough.

Then I went in search of a Paterson Orbital (it's a bit like a daylight tray), which I really like. Very economical with chemicals, and I get nice even results every time. It does four 4x5/9x12, two 5x7 or one 8x10 at a time.