Process roll film

Old_Dick · Aug 3, 2017

Hi Folks,

Has anyone used this method of processing? It' new to me.

Sirius Glass · Aug 3, 2017

Gerald C Koch · Aug 3, 2017

Perhaps if the oaf in the video had learned the correct method of agitation using tanks he wouldn't have density problems. I have been using SS tanks for decades without any problems. But then I follow Kodak's agitation method.

Neal · Aug 4, 2017

How many millions of rolls of film have been properly processed on reels in tanks?

darkroommike · Aug 4, 2017

I processed 120 roll film in 0.5 gallon hard rubber tanks this way in 1976, we had no 120 reels in our press photography class so we used this method. I've also used the "see saw" method. I do not recommend either. His horrible long video typifies everything that's wrong with bad Youtube. I was 10 minutes into the video (I skipped ahead) before I saw anything, 15 seconds later I left the video. Buy a reel and a tank.

tezzasmall · Aug 4, 2017

Wot a carry on!

I 'seasawed' my first couple of films in the 70's when just starting out and never had all the right equipment, which was outside of my pocket money / part-time job range. BUT as soon as I got my first tank - which I still use decades later, I've not done it any other way.

Yes, in a changing bag especially, it can get a bit humid and sticky and the film occasionally gets stuck, but it's GOT to be better than the way he does it for sure!

But then again, each to their own methods and what they feel comfortable in doing but thank you Paterson for making my tank and reel.

Terry S

Helios 1984 · Aug 4, 2017

Hummm isn't it unsafe to bath your fngers in film developer?

David Brown · Aug 4, 2017

Neal said:
How many millions of rolls of film have been properly processed on reels in tanks?

Gerald C Koch said:
Perhaps if the oaf in the video had learned the correct method of agitation using tanks he wouldn't have density problems. I have been using SS tanks for decades without any problems. ...

Yet another example of someone coming to film recently, and rather than taking a class (with someone experienced) and/or reading a standard textbook (or even the instructions), they have decided they are smarter than everyone else who has ever done this and will "reinvent the wheel". And then they'll make a bad Youtube video to share their insights ...

Paul Howell · Aug 4, 2017

I have Kodak books from the 40s and early 50s that discuss how to see saw film, don't know why he has issues with uneven density, if done slowly at a steady pace ought not be any issues. Other not wanting to buy a tank and reels don't know why anyone would want to do this, Patterson tanks and reels are inexpensive.

Gerald C Koch · Aug 4, 2017

There are two main problems with this 'wondrous' method. First you are placing your unprotected hands in the processing solutions. Second there is the problem of 'cinching." Cinching occurs when the roll of film is pulled taught. The film rubs against itself with the possibility of scratch marks.

This video also points out the difficulty of trying to learn from the internet. How can the average newbie tell the gems of wisdom from all the dross? They can't! This is why I always recommend getting a good book on photography and reading it thoroughly. Money limited then buy a used copy.

MattKing · Aug 4, 2017

Helios 1984 said:
Hummm isn't it unsafe to bath your fngers in film developer?

For most people, in most circumstances, probably not.
But for some it can lead to heightened sensitivity (essentially an allergy), which isn't good, and certainly isn't enjoyable.
So it certainly isn't wise.

pentaxuser · Aug 4, 2017

Not many threads produce views that are as unanimous as this, even after as little as 8 posts. It gives me faith that we on APUG are not always at odds with each other. Now to return to the subject of Kodak bulk roll pricing........

pentaxuser

GRHazelton · Aug 5, 2017

And a "Systems Engineer" came up with this antiquated method? Good grief! My Father, a Chemical Engineer, told me of processing a cassette by the see-saw method at the NC State U. lab. During the miserable process - his words! - he heard a continuing sort of crunchy sound; it was late at night. When he could finally turn on the room lights he saw a huge cockroach on the soap dish in front of him. It was dining on the bar of soap!

Arklatexian · Aug 5, 2017

Gerald C Koch said:
There are two main problems with this 'wondrous' method. First you are placing your unprotected hands in the processing solutions. Second there is the problem of 'cinching." Cinching occurs when the roll of film is pulled taught. The film rubs against itself with the possibility of scratch marks.

This video also points out the difficulty of trying to learn from the internet. How can the average newbie tell the gems of wisdom from all the dross? They can't! This is why I always recommend getting a good book on photography and reading it thoroughly. Money limited then buy a used copy.

You are right on track, Gerald. I gathered from the second part of your comment that you believe in the value of reading! For the life of me, I cannot imagine someone seriously interested in analog photography who does not read every thing they can get their hands on about the subject. If you can't read, get someone to read the information to you, if you won't read, best find another line of endeavor. Today in analog photography more than any other time in my lifetime, reading is essential........Regards!

Process roll film

Moderator

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency