Nomad
Member
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2010
- Messages
- 46
- Format
- Multi Format
Is there any sort of convention or reasoning behind the various process names, like Calotype, Ambrotype, etc? In some cases, it seems to be little more than various Victorian gentlemen stamping their name on something, while others refer more to the process itself, like Cyanotype.
Just wondering...
Just wondering...
Ovotype (of egg) sprung to mind, but is maybe too generic on the assumption that the 'type' has to be a bit more specific than just the binder. Been reading a bit more, and it seems that they break down to ones based on the originator's name, some based on the process, and some that are more conceptual (Calotype and Ambrotype are both from Greek words, for beautiful and immortal or impression, respectively).