I don't wish to sound argumentative or curmudgeonly but the OP has already said that he (a) cleaned out his Nova and filled with fresh chemicals (b) he changed from old Jessops paper to new Kentmere paper and (c) did 3 tests on his fixer which were OK .
So do I have answer? No, but I am presuming that it cannot rest on anything which stems from his Nova, chemicals, paper or fixer, based on what he has said.
So can there be anything else which can be reconciled with a,b, and c above that might be causing the issue?
I cannot think of anything other than having the thought that there is something wrong with some part of his process/materials which is not as sound as he thinks.
The strange thing is that each print, I think, only has the problem in the borders although each print's borders seem to exhibit a different problem.
Normally with a Nova the only time you touch the border with fingers is when you attach the sheet to the Nova clip me. Is there anything that could be on his fingers that could produce these effects which then show up under room light which I presume is switched on towards the end of the fixer stage or immediately on the sheet's extraction from the fixer and if so, it would seem to appear in what sounds like almost an instant after removal of the print from the fixer?
Really I am just shooting in the dark here but I throw the above in on a "just in case" basis
pentaxuser
Agitation could be a cause, the chem volume in a Nova is very small, compared to trays of equivalent size. So if the OP is putting the print in without agitation, uneven fixing wouldn't be a surprise, even with fresh fix. I use a 12x16 Nova, I've occasionally experienced similar staining on the top edge of the print where it's fasten to the clip due to low fix volume causing the top of the print to not be immersed. However, the OP's problem affects the whole print, and the staining is a classic symptom of a fixing problem.
I think it is essential we known what Nova he has. If it's a 4 slot then I'd be surprised if he hasn't used the second slot for stop. On the other hand if it is the two slot which I think exist then carry-over is possible. How much would be required to do what he describes, would it exhibit this almost instantly and what effect can we expect to see in the print area. The print area seems unaffectedAnother possibility is the fixer is contaminated with developer from too much carryover. That would explain the borders changing color as soon as light hits it.
Have you tried processing in a tray to rule out your Nova?
Are you using an acid stop bath? How long are you fixing? What is your fixer test procedure?
Given that you are using a Nova, it might be a problem with locally exhausted fixer. You need to ensure that the fixer is moving over the entire print.
Agitation could be a cause, the chem volume in a Nova is very small, compared to trays of equivalent size. So if the OP is putting the print in without agitation, uneven fixing wouldn't be a surprise, even with fresh fix. However, the OP's problem affects the whole print, and the staining is a classic symptom of a fixing problem.
If you want to check for adequate fixing. Dunk the print in selenium toner. You will get instant brown crud. Simple steps. Fresh paper all new chemistry.
Another possibility is the fixer is contaminated with developer from too much carryover. That would explain the borders changing color as soon as light hits it.
I have a three slot heated Nova processor, into which I have Ilford MG developer, Kodak acid stop bath and Ilford Hypam fixer.I think it is essential we known what Nova he has. If it's a 4 slot then I'd be surprised if he hasn't used the second slot for stop. On the other hand if it is the two slot which I think exist then carry-over is possible. How much would be required to do what he describes, would it exhibit this almost instantly and what effect can we expect to see in the print area. The print area seems unaffected
pentaxuser
The Potassium Iodide test is misleading because it is hard to interpret. Also, since papers are low in iodide or contain no iodide, the test will fail.
Retained silver is usually a test for wash quality and thus retained hypo, but it also tells us that the fix step has failed, if the wash step is good.
Basically, aside from the KI test, there are two others. One involves AgNO3 (Silver Nitrate) in Acetic Acid and the other is Na2S (Sodium Sulfide) in water which does not keep well. Either of these two will darken if there is hypo or Silver Halide present and thus they test for fix activity and wash quality if both are done at the end of the entire process.
Myself, I use a blix made by mixing Ferric Ammonium EDTA with the fix. Then I develop a strip in the light which turns it black and dip it in the blix and measure the time to clear. As I use the fix, the time goes up until the strip being tested will not clear. At that point the fixer is dead, but I usually stop using the fixer before then based on the time needed to clear a strip.
And remember, the fix is actually "dead" before any of these tests say it is. It needs an earlier cutoff than these tests indicate.
PE
Thanks, Terry. I had every reason to believe that it was probably not a two slot but I felt I had to ask so we could eliminate that as a cause.I have a three slot heated Nova processor, into which I have Ilford MG developer, Kodak acid stop bath and Ilford Hypam fixer.
And yes, two and one slot Nova's exist.
Terry S
I know it's a remote possibility, but what about the easel you're using? Is there any chance there's some sort of contamination on the underside of the arms that hold the paper down?As said, adequate agitation was done but the stains ONLY affect the borders and NOT THE WHOLE PRINT as you've stated
I know it's a remote possibility, but what about the easel you're using? Is there any chance there's some sort of contamination on the underside of the arms that hold the paper down?
I know it's a remote possibility, but what about the easel you're using? Is there any chance there's some sort of contamination on the underside of the arms that hold the paper down?
What is your dilution for the fix? Can you also give the quantities of fix and water in Liter and/or CC?
No paper safe is used. I put the pack of paper straight back in the box once a sheet has been taken out, with it's original black bag folded over to basically double seal the open end. The Jessops paper is a bit old and the Kentmere about a year. Both are stored in a good temperature in my insulated darkroom. The main thing is that they were both fine one minute and then returning to the session the following day, the problems started. If it was age or storage problems, I would expect to see it happen gradually. I will also be trying out other papers that I have to see if they react as well and then it's a matter of trying various things out before changing the chemicals for the third time if no solution if found.OK , Do you use a paper safe? I have picked up several of the clam shell type paper safes. These have a locking clip that will cock the lid open slightly when not locked. I have seen edge fogging. Fresh paper? ??
No chance at all Winger. My fingers go no where near the underside of the easel and if I do get even the smallest amount of any chemical on my hands whilst in the darkroom, I have a bucket of clean water to rinse my hands in.I know it's a remote possibility, but what about the easel you're using? Is there any chance there's some sort of contamination on the underside of the arms that hold the paper down?
Hopefully I will be back in the darkroom this afternoon mcfitz = the Nova is turned on and warming up as we speak.Along with the above suggestion, what about developing a sheet of unexposed paper, and maybe leaving it under the easel for a half minute or so?
Ilford Hypam fixer diluted at 1 + 9, with the Nova slots holding 2 litres of diluted chemicals each. So that's 200ml of fixer and 1800ml of water that goes into the fixer slot.What is your dilution for the fix? Can you also give the quantities of fix and water in Liter and/or CC?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?