I just sometimes get a sense that much of the current cachet value is generated not out of true craftsmanship or artistic sensibilities but solely out of a clever marketing campaign.
Some of the prominent galleries I've been in here have among the most boring and very large color images I've ever seen at prices of multiple thousands of dollars.
My wife calls me her long term high risk investment, so maybe those high rollers will notice me one day
The market value is easy to ascertain - it's the price; artistic value, perhaps trades in another currency.
I'll agree with that.
While it's important to always strive to do the best work possible, I think the bar in Chuck1's case is set considerably lower than when you decided to start selling your personal work, which came after years of running a successful photography studio in New York.
Murray
Making photographs that you really believe in, making them as well as you are able, and offering them for sale wherever you can get an audience seems to be the most promising route to take.
One mystifying factor about art pricing is its unpredictability - I found that I actually sold MORE when I raised my prices. There's this perception-of-value thing that goes along with pricing. Many people looking to buy art will not buy something they think of as "too cheap" even if they really like the image.....
I believe this also. The question is always: how to separate the customer from their money.
High price = high quality emphasis - attracts the affluent type w/money to burn - for those who only buy the best of everything, they believe that the highest priced items are always the "best".
Low price = fair deal emphasis - attracts customers with lower income levels - for those who only buy what they can afford.
Literature on starting a business present this marketing strategy in more detail. It's as if you need to have two price lists to cover both targets. The price that leads to actual sales is usually determined by customer response, obviously, similar to selling real estate.
I think there's some more complex market psychology going on here. If you price it for the "value" customer, you have to aim your entire body of work to them, until which time you become famous enough that you can have a dual-range collection of original prints and reproductions. If you try to split those two high and low markets, the high end will not buy your work because some portion of it is being sold for less than they paid, therefore cheapening the rest of your work. You may also not make sales with the low end, because part of what attracts them to buy is the perception of value, same as with the high end. There is a second market for low end pricing, which can be best described as the "Decor" market- as in, the customer is buying the photo because it matches their sofa/wallcovering/carpet/furniture. At this point, your work is disposable. If you think of your work that way, then the disposable crowd is a very large market and you may have some success with selling to them.
There's only one other photographer who has a couple of prints their for sale, and I believe they were digital prints. Price for a mounted and overmatted 12 x 17 image in a 16x20 mount was $295, so he was hoping to make about $200 after the 30%.
.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?