Interesting post. Would you mind indicating how "large" (quantity, print size etc.) your jobs tend to be?
Tom
Technique aside, the prices you have mentioned are nowhere near viable as a sustainable business model. I don't care how low your overheads are... once you have covered marketing, promotion, film costs, fuel, insurance and so on, not to mention your time, you will be losing money.
From the Canadian (common-law provinces) perspective, I would agree with Solarize, except I would re-order the priorities:
1) Public liability (in case someone should get injured (or something broken) while you work);
2) Professional indemnity (in case you should you fail to provide the services contracted) and
3) Equipment insurance.
I would also check my auto insurance, to make sure it covers you when you are working commercially.
Experience with issues like insurance is one good reason to investigate professional photographers' associations.
Is it possible to have them sign some kind of contract that says that I am not resposable for anything that could happen to them or is insurance still needed?
Is it possible to have them sign some kind of contract that says that I am not resposable for anything that could happen to them or is insurance still needed?
Is it possible to have them sign some kind of contract that says that I am not resposable for anything that could happen to them or is insurance still needed?
Is it possible to have them sign some kind of contract that says that I am not resposable for anything that could happen to them or is insurance still needed?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?