• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Price of 85mm primes?

Forum statistics

Threads
201,099
Messages
2,819,083
Members
100,525
Latest member
bronicaEnthusiast
Recent bookmarks
0

GraemeMitchell

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 14, 2005
Messages
420
Location
NYC
Format
Multi Format
I don't know about price, but I often shoot entire fashion stories between an 85mm and a 50mm. I prefer the 50 as it's more rewarding to shoot well, but the 85 can create sexy very easy.

I actually got mine cheap with a 28mm 1.4 from a PJ switching to canon. $1200 for both in excellent condition.

I'm very interested in the new Zeiss ZF 85 and 50 too. If for no other reason than their dedicated manual focus design. I can't manually focus my 50 nikkor at all with it's loose barrel. And I feel the price on these is suprisingly reasonable.
 
OP
OP
Michel Hardy-Vallée

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,794
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format
Resurrecting an old thread, but I thought anyone interested in seeing the results of a Jupiter-9 can have a look at the photo of a sculpture in my gallery. It passes the Fred Picker test of branches against a sky.

I've also shot some pictures at my brother's wedding with it last summer, and damn me, I couldn't find which ones I took with my Pentax lenses, and which ones I took with the J-9. I suppose that under untrying circumstances (soft light that day, very diffused), it's hard to be a bad lens.

I do like the perspective of the 85mm, it is indeed an ideal lens for making portraits while keeping a close distance to the subject. The 135mm doesn't give as much volume to the face, and sets you farther back from the subject. In fact, I found that the ideal distance for the 135mm was to photograph subjects in the middle of a street when you stand on a sidewalk. Call it a "Parade" focal.
 

Claire Senft

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 7, 2004
Messages
3,239
Location
Milwaukee, W
Format
35mm
I bought a 100mm f2 Planar for my Contax and it was every bit as dear as an 85mm 1.4. It is a most satisfactory lens.

I used to own both a Canon 1.8 85mm Serenar in LTM and a Nikon 85mm F2 in Nikon Rangefinder mount. Both were a far cry from a modern lens wide open but otherwise nice at medium apetures.

To add to Mr Cardwell's long list of 85mm F1.2 lenses I would add the 85mm 1.2 Planar in MM mount...lots of luck in finding one at a price that is palatable.
 

naturephoto1

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 26, 2006
Messages
1,960
Location
Breinigsville
Format
Multi Format
I have a Leica f2.0 90mm Summicron R lens for my R series Leicas that I purchased used in about 1985. Outstanding performance and very sharp. Lens used as I recall cost about $350?? at the time. Now they would be much more, but the prices have increased since then. Additionally, as I recall Leica's R lenses over 90mm?? are all Apo lenses.

Rich
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom