David A. Goldfarb said:I think these were actually quite expensive lenses in their day. Look at camera prices from the same period, and if I remember correctly, a Verito is two or three times the price of one of the standard 8x10" flatbed cameras.
I think I paid around $250-350 more or less for each of my two Veritos--11.5" and 14". The 18" tends to run more, and the short ones are a bit rare.
The Ektars that are Heliar-types are the 100mm/3.5 Medalist lens and the 105/3.7 that I think was targeted for the baby Graphic. I've adapted the Medalist one for 35mm, and it's an outstanding lens, so I think it would be a great place to start. Here's a page on the adaptation--
Dead Link Removed
I find that the Heliar-effect is strongest with a lens that is on the long side for the format, so if you've got the 105/3.7 Ektar, try it maybe with a 6x6 or 645 back on the Speed, if you've got one.
mrcallow said:David's prices are right on the money for the good ones or those in shutter a little high for those that are suspect. I have been watching them on ebay. Matt PM me if you don't have a RFH I would be happy to lend you one for time so you can experiment.
smieglitz said:Matt,
The price of Veritos has really increased the last couple years.
MattCarey said:I wonder if there are other people like me remembering their childhood pictures...Matt
MattCarey said:I noted that some people also recommend the Heliar lens design. I may give my 105mm Ektar (supposedly a modified Heliar) a go wide open on the ol' mini-speed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?