• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Presoaking film and development time


I have never had an airbell whether I rap the tank or use a Jobo processor and I always presoak. End of discussion.
 
Perhaps we should introduce a pre-soak before pre-soak. A bit like the fallacy of getting a closer shave with multiple blade razors.
 

Rather than basing my presoaking on an assumption, I started doing it as an experiment and it worked for me. I don't know why it worked when I had faint airbells with Neopan400 in 120 size. Prior to using that film, I hadn't experienced an airbell for half a century. Now that Neopan is finished, I've moved to HP5+ in 120 size, I still do a presoak but I don't know if it's necessary. Maybe I'll try a roll without.
 
"A pre-rinse is not recommended as it can lead to uneven development."

This is the advice from Ilford on their data sheet for PanF+

Take a look at the second paragraph, last line, page three of the Ilford data sheet.


I have only skimmed through this topic here on Photrio so forgive me if it has already been pointed out before.
 
Perhaps we should introduce a pre-soak before pre-soak...

Two sequential pre-soaks was the only way I was ever able to rid original Acros of airbells when developing it using inversion agitation in small tanks. Sheets in Jobo Expert drums on rotary processors didn't exhibit the problem.
 
...

I have only skimmed through this topic here on Photrio so forgive me if it has already been pointed out before.
It gets mentioned everytime the subject comes up. Note that Ilford did not say pre-soaking causes uneven development, and that Ilford made a recomondation, not an 'rule'.
 
It gets mentioned everytime the subject comes up. Note that Ilford did not say pre-soaking causes uneven development, and that Ilford made a recomondation, not an 'rule'.
"It gets mentioned every time the subject comes up." and still no progress? Sounds like Groundhog Day to me.


True, Ilford does not say it will cause uneven development. But they do say "it can lead to uneven development."

Cheers Vaughn.
 
Definitely Groundhog Day material!!

All the stages of development can lead to uneven development -- if the moon is out-of-phase, a low is lollygagging through, someone sneezed on the stainless, or puts a surfactant in the developer.

That extra bit of Scotch will not magically turn that fixer I am pouring in the tank into Ilford developer.. Actually -- I acheived very even non-development if I remember rightly.