Preferred Brand of aerosol air for cleaning negatives and film holders?

Barn Curves

A
Barn Curves

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
img421.jpg

H
img421.jpg

  • Tel
  • Apr 26, 2025
  • 1
  • 1
  • 30
Caution Post

A
Caution Post

  • 3
  • 1
  • 44
Hidden

A
Hidden

  • 2
  • 0
  • 40

Forum statistics

Threads
197,483
Messages
2,759,772
Members
99,514
Latest member
cukon
Recent bookmarks
0

Todd Barlow

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 9, 2004
Messages
492
Location
Ontario
Format
Multi Format
Hi all:
Is there a preferred brand of aerosol air for dusting negatives and film holders?
Thanks
Todd
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,990
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Read the respective MSDS.

Most likely by now they all contain the same refrigerent of the 4th generation.
 
Last edited:

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,990
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
I don't use such at all. Never had a can in house. If I would I would buy what is available locally. Here in Europe that likely are the aerosols of Kontaktchemie. At your side likely known as CRC.
 

BAC1967

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
1,413
Location
Bothell, WA
Format
Medium Format

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,945
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
The stuff Costco sells in a 6 can pack - expensive, but all of our keyboards and a few other things seem to benefit as well.
The product is "Dust-Off Professional Electronics compressed-gas Duster".
 

jimjm

Subscriber
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
1,222
Location
San Diego CA
Format
Multi Format
I've used canned air before, but never again on anything delicate like film. It's not easy to control the pressure and it'll leave residue on the film if it's too close.
I just use a Giottos Rocket Blaster for film, along with an anti-static brush for the film holders and the enlarger negative carriers.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,569
Location
Eugene, Oregon
Format
4x5 Format
Ditto on the bulb-blower. I don't like the "canned air" products for a number of reasons: too much pressure, hard to control and the risk of spraying a layer of propellant onto your negative. The hand-blower does the job just fine and has to be more environmentally friendly. When static builds up, I have an old Zerostat that I use to neutralize the static, then I use the blower again. Stubborn dust particles get a light swipe with a soft-bristle brush or a microfiber cloth. That's all I've ever needed.

Best,

Doremus
 

Luckless

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Messages
1,363
Location
Canada
Format
Multi Format
So far I've been using a bulb-blower and brush, but I have considered getting a hand pumped compressed air tank.

I had a kid's air-brush kit growing up, and found the simple tank and nozzle setup was great for generating a good jet of air when cleaning parts and stuff after the inks all ran dry and I couldn't find replacements for them. As an air-brush it was rather unimpressive, but was great for working on computers and stuff. Took up about as much space as a half dozen cans of air, but lasted far longer and didn't have a noisy pump to listen to or really do much with.

I use a 20 lb tank of CO2 with a compressed air nozzle attached. No propellent, no moisture.

For anyone looking to do the same, be sure to double check the tank style and nozzle setup.

Using a CO2 tank fitted with a bottom-draw line and no expansion chamber before the nozzle is a very different experience compared to a top-draw tank with two stage expansion chamber... Pouring liquid CO2 over your hand when you're expecting a jet of cool air is not a great way to start your day.

Worse still, it probably isn't good for the negatives!
 

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,602
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
If you use compressed air and have severe static issues, Kinetronics makes a compressed air can Ionizer that you snap on any air can. It runs on a single AA battery and has a 10 foot grounding wire. Shoots negative ions into the air stream with a pull of the trigger.

However, it is kind of expensive...
 

Brendan Quirk

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 3, 2018
Messages
227
Location
Mayville, WI USA
Format
Medium Format
I use an air tank which I fill with a small shop compressor. Although I don't use an inline filter, I get good results, but must refill a couple of times per printing session. Be aware that the lack of a filter could allow moisture from condensation to contaminate the air stream. This set up has eliminated the high cost of canned air, the risk of propellant on the negative, and is more controllable at the nozzle.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,990
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Using a CO2 tank fitted with a bottom-draw line and no expansion chamber before the nozzle is a very different experience compared to a top-draw tank with two stage expansion chamber... Pouring liquid CO2 over your hand when you're expecting a jet of cool air is not a great way to start your day.

Worse still, it probably isn't good for the negatives!

Similar applies to "aerosol-air".
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,990
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Read the respective MSDS.

Most likely by now they all contain the same refrigerent of the 4th generation.
Less Ozone-destructive but instead flamable and with even more toxic product.

But there still are versions that contain Propane/Isobutane !
 

Eric Rose

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2002
Messages
6,841
Location
T3A5V4
Format
Multi Format
I use one of my old scuba tanks. The refills are medical grade air. No worries about micro blobs of oil getting on my negs. And when that is empty, between fills I use Armani air :wink:
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,990
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Just using any old tank would not work in Europe, where high-pressured gas tanks must be technical controlled after some period before refilling. For technical gases that is in Germany 10 years, for scuba tanks even only 2.5 years.
 

Eric Rose

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2002
Messages
6,841
Location
T3A5V4
Format
Multi Format
Just using any old tank would not work in Europe, where high-pressured gas tanks must be technical controlled after some period before refilling. For technical gases that is in Germany 10 years, for scuba tanks even only 2.5 years.
We have the same regulations here too. Surprise eh.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2012
Messages
3,285
Format
35mm RF
Skip the canned air. I prefer an anti static brush. Works great. I do have a 'rocket blower' type squeeze bulb but don't use it that often. I do use canned air when I am cleaning the enlarger and cleaning other things. I just don't use it on negs.
 
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Messages
1,882
Location
Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
Format
Medium Format
One problem with canned air is that the stuff sold in stores has a chemical added to it to make it taste bad. The purpose is to discourage idiots from inhaling the stuff to get high. This is probably effective, but the 'bitterant' used leaves a residue when you spray lenses or film or scanner glass.

Fortunately, you CAN get canned air that doesn't have this stuff in it. You have to buy it from industrial supply companies. I get it from a company called Kimco. Unlike many other industrial suppliers, Kimco is willing to sell a few cans at a time, rather than making you buy a large, expensive quantity. Here's the stuff I buy:

https://gokimco.com/techspray-1671-10s-non-flammable-hfc134a-based-duster-10-oz.html

It is a little more expensive than the stuff sold in stores, but it works so much better that it is worth it.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,990
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
One problem with canned air is that the stuff sold in stores has a chemical added to it to make it taste bad.

Good point, though not of general truth. At least there are aerosols sold over the counter that employ gases that give no reasons to sniff.

Fortunately, you CAN get canned air that doesn't have this stuff in it. You have to buy it from industrial supply companies. I get it from a company called Kimco.

It employs a refrigerant of older generation. It is not Ozone-destructive, not flamable, but has a massive glass-house effect. As such it is at least partially banned in the EU.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,990
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
I am surprised how many aspects this thread brought up.


To sum up possible issues to be considered when using "canned air"

-) flamability
-) toxicity
-) cooling if liquid ist blown out (freezing of skin, water condensation on emulsion, solvent effect on emulsion)
-) condensation of less volatile ingredients
 

Neal

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 3, 2004
Messages
2,012
Location
Chicago, West Suburbs
Format
Multi Format
I like the cans from Costco. You use next to nothing as all you need is a quick clearing spritz and then a quick spray to each side of the negative. I still have 3 untouched cans from a six pack purchase about 2 years ago. I keep the three opened cans where I need them. By my scanner, by my enlarger and in my travel bag for when I use a local community darkroom. Remember, don't move the can, move the target. Otherwise you will surely end up with some refrigerant on your negatives.

Good luck,

Neal Wydra
 

tezzasmall

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2013
Messages
1,125
Location
Southend on Sea Essex UK
Format
Plastic Cameras
I too use a 'Rocket' air bulb blower on all my negs before enlarging and occasionally I also use a small anti-static brush.

I've heard of too many worrying stories about using aerosols on film over the years to use one, although I am sure the quality and safety of using one now is probably a lot safer than it used to be = unless anyone can state otherwise???

Terry S
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom