I didn't like the work print and trashed it partially developed. A week later when cleaning out the trash in the darkroom I saw that it was partially solarized and the chemicals had developed into an interesting patina and I liked it. (Actually this is a recreation, the original is in LACMA) I finished processing, dry mounted it and showed it to the then curator of LACMA and they took it into the permanent collection.
Wonderful print, VaughnI guess this is an abstract -- I know what it is, most people will not.
8x10 carbon print
Lava Beds National Monument, CA
Even when the image appears abstract at first sight but the title says it's a dune, it's not abstract anymore
So you are saying if an image is an image of something, it can't be an abstract, or if the photographer tells you what it is it loses its nature as an abstract. Sounds like photographers should just keep it's identity a secret. Also, can you expand on what you mean by "non-figurative".Sorry to say, but an 'abstract dune shot' is a contradictio in terminis, because abstract is non-figurative by definition. Even when the image appears abstract at first sight but the title says it's a dune, it's not abstract anymore.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?