I dont think anyone here believes a MF fixed-lens TLR is the "ideal" tools for taking focus-sensitive photos of faces and upper torsos, commonly known as "portraits". Yes, you can make ends meet with some workarounds, but "ideal" they are probably not.
I do....
"Ideal"?I do....
"Ideal"?
"Ideal"?
One can make a good portrait with any camera and any lens. The key component is the photographer. If the photographer is lacking, no equipment will help.
While this argument is valid it is certainly not sound as the truth contradicts the primary premise.
One can make a good portrait with any camera and any lens. The key component is the photographer. If the photographer is lacking, no equipment will help.
While this argument is valid it is certainly not sound as the truth contradicts the primary premise.
The first sentence in @Pieter12 's post says one thing. The third sentence in that post then contradicts (mostly) what was said in the first sentence.Please explain.
Please explain.
Hi,
I want to get more experience with portrait photography. Still no Pentax 67, but I have a beautiful Rolleiflex 3.5F with Rolleinar 1 and 2.
I have a Rick Oleson spilt screen ground glass in my Rolleiflex.
I lean on the coupled lichtmeter (yes I know....). I also use only natural light.
In some pictures I made, if found it hard to focus, and some portraits are slightly out of focus, maybe due to too open aperture, but don't know for sure.
Anyhow, tips and tricks are welcome!
Thanks in advance!
One can make a good portrait with any camera and any lens. The key component is the photographer. If the photographer is lacking, no equipment will help.
While this argument is valid it is certainly not sound as the truth contradicts the primary premise.
The short answer.
My counter argument is based on the premise that millions of good portraits are being taken everyday by 'lacking photographers'.
"Ideal"?
I think it can be, in the hands of those who appreciate them and for whom they work well for.
And poorly suited to those whose needs and preferences are different.
If a TLR isn't for portraits then why do I have a portrait lens for my Mamiya C33?
I still do not understand, without even taking a single real or mock shot with the camera of controversy for portraits (Rolleiflex with 75/80mm) and the suggested aid such as Rolleinar I/II, the discussion has went for 6-pages...
I've shot already portraits (not head/shoulder shots) with the Rolleiflex without the Rolleinar. Only some issues with proper focussing...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?