- Joined
- Oct 11, 2006
- Messages
- 2,184
- Format
- Multi Format
I believe most of the portraits were taken in 1989 at the Indian Congress held in conjunction with the Trans-Mississippi and International Exposition.
.... The printing on the envelope says, among other things, "Rinehart's North American Indian Prints - 1898 -... Series 1"....
Umm, I'd guess exactly a century earlier than 1989...
As the high bider, you just determined their top market worth. How much did you pay?I just won an auction ...
I think they are probably platinum/paladium prints
Thanks for the suggestion.Shane Balkowitsch does contemporary native American people in this style using mostly wet plate. Maybe he might be of assistance.
Value is eye of beholder and/or whatever price the market will bare in whatever acceptable timeframe.
As the high bider, you just determined their top market worth.
I agree. From OP's photo they don't really look like photographic prints - at least I have not seen palladium/platinum prints presented like this. Is it possible that it is photogravure?The black caption makes them look like they're not photographic prints. Are the photos mounted on the sheet that has the caption?
I agree. From OP's photo they don't really look like photographic prints - at least I have not seen palladium/platinum prints presented like this. Is it possible that it is photogravure?
I expect Alan to have enough expertice to differ beetween a silver gelatin photographic print and a intaglio, autotype or offset print.
I'm pretty sure they aren't silver gelatin prints because the images are on a textured paper with no sign of an emulsion. There is no burn through on the back as noted by Tony D. It's possible that they may be some type of reproduction print rather than platinum or platinum/palladium. To be honest, I'm not sure how to tell the difference between platinum and some type of reproduction process just by inspecting the prints. However, based on some of the comments in this thread I am strongly suspecting that they are reproductions of originals rather than originals.Good point. Those captions could be part of the photograph, but with a caption already mounted within the images this is rather unlikely.
On the other hand, I expect Alan to have enough expertice to differ beetween a silver gelatin photographic print and a intaglio, autotype or offset print.
a scan of one of the pictures
Thanks for the tip. When I look at a picture using a microscope objective I do see a dot pattern, so these are some kind of half-tone reproductions of the originals. This means the pictures are not extremely valuable. However, at least they came from the original studio, and the dot pattern seems very fine, so they are probably not quite worthless.Look for regular dot pattern on the scan, when you zoom in. A real photographic print (silver gelatin or platinum) won't have that. I've seen some very clear reproductions, though, where no pattern is easily discernible.
given the envelope
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?