• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Portrait lens for Nikon

Mary Elizabeth

A
Mary Elizabeth

  • 2
  • 0
  • 84
Untitled

A
Untitled

  • 11
  • 2
  • 100

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
201,076
Messages
2,818,639
Members
100,513
Latest member
Ertes
Recent bookmarks
1

Mongo

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 17, 2004
Messages
960
Location
Pittsburgh,
Format
Multi Format
I have both the 105mm f/2.5 and the 105mm f/4 Micro-Nikkor. Both excellent lenses, but the f/2.5 lens is a better lens for portraiture for me. There's a smoothness in the transition from sharp focus to out-of-focus areas that the Micro-Nikkor doesn't match. It's hard to describe the effect, but it's definately there. The Micro-Nikkor is an amazing lens at macro distances, but it just seems too harsh to me for portraits.

I used to have the 85mm f/1.8, but I found that I reached for it so rarely that I got rid of it. It's a wonderful lens, especially in available light situations, but it never matched the way I envisioned my work...the longer reach of the 105mm works better for me.

Oddly enough, the 140mm macro is my favorite portrait lens on the Mamiya RB-67. I seem to go for shorter lenses as I use larger film. I'm not sure why that is...probably a sign of brain damage from my mis-spent youth. :smile:

One thing that I believe it is safe to assume: Nikkon makes the best range of high quality lenses in the traditional portrait focal lengths. I don't believe there's a real dog in the bunch.
 

lkorell

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 10, 2005
Messages
37
Location
Agua Dulce,
Format
Multi Format
My three favorite Nikon manual lenses:

85 1.4 AIS
105 2.5 AI (not sure if there's an AIS)
55 2.8 AIS Micro

All three will do a beautiful job with people. For a larger lens, the 180 2.8AIS can't be beat. The one with the gold band around it is the one I have.


Lou
 

André E.C.

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 21, 2004
Messages
1,518
Location
Finland
Format
Medium Format
lkorell said:
For a larger lens, the 180 2.8AIS can't be beat. The one with the gold band around it is the one I have.


Lou


Easily by the AF 180mm f/2.8 ED IF!

Cheers

André
 

Natron

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 25, 2004
Messages
24
Location
WI
Format
35mm
I'm also going to cast my vote for the Nikkor 85mm f/1.4. I own the AIS version but am told the AF version has quite a few improvements. Humbug! The AIS version is very nice. Between the 105mm and 85mm, I'd just make it a matter of whether you want 85mm or 105mm more and if you value lens speed or lens price more (the 85mm f/1.4 isn't the cheapest lens out there).
 

John L

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 30, 2004
Messages
32
Location
SF Bay Area,
Format
35mm
I have the 85mm f1.4 and really love it. If you can handle the expense and bulk, you should try one out.

That said, I would also consider a slower 85mm. f1.4 is useful in available-light situations, but depth of field under 10 ft is very shallow. Having eyes sharp and nose blurry isn't often what people want. If you're doing studio-type portraiture where light will always be available, I don't think the extra stop or half-stop is worth it.
 

puderse

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87
Location
where the west begins
Format
35mm
My first additional lens in 1971 for my F was a 105. Sharpest of the bunch. Almost legendary. Shot ballet with it yesterday.
 

Gerald Koch

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 14, 2004
Messages
1,662
Format
Multi Format
I would recommend anything in the range 80 to 105mm. Anything longer like the 135 will cause too much flattening of facial features.
 

MattCarey

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 5, 2004
Messages
1,303
Format
Multi Format
John L said:
I have the 85mm f1.4 and really love it. If you can handle the expense and bulk, you should try one out.

That said, I would also consider a slower 85mm. f1.4 is useful in available-light situations, but depth of field under 10 ft is very shallow. Having eyes sharp and nose blurry isn't often what people want. If you're doing studio-type portraiture where light will always be available, I don't think the extra stop or half-stop is worth it.

In close, I find that even 1.8 is a bit too open. Could be just that I am lame at focusing!

Matt
 

BradS

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
8,126
Location
Soulsbyville, California
Format
35mm
Juraj Kovacik said:
I'm going to buy new lens for my FM3a, mechanical, without AF, something around 105 mm. any advice? thanks. JK

Another vote for the 1:2.5/105mm AIS Nikkor.
 

narsuitus

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 24, 2004
Messages
1,813
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
Juraj Kovacik said:
I'm going to buy new lens for my FM3a, mechanical, without AF, something around 105 mm. any advice? thanks. JK
Here are the Nikon lenses I use for 35mm portrait work:

28mm for large group portrait

35mm f/2 for environmental portrait or small group portrait

Normal lens for full-length portrait

85mm f/1.8 for half-length or for head & shoulder portrait

105mm f/2.5 for head & shoulder or for head shot

105mm f/2.8 macro with soft focus filter for head & shoulder or for head shot or for close-ups of body parts

180mm f/2.8 with extension tube for head shot or for tight face shot
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom