Portra negatives coming out of development too dark

Oranges

A
Oranges

  • 1
  • 0
  • 14
Charging Station

A
Charging Station

  • 0
  • 0
  • 12
Paintin' growth

D
Paintin' growth

  • 1
  • 0
  • 33
Spain

A
Spain

  • 4
  • 0
  • 37

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,104
Messages
2,769,664
Members
99,562
Latest member
jwb134
Recent bookmarks
1

1kgcoffee

Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2017
Messages
500
Location
Calgary
Format
Medium Format
Recently shot a bunch of portra (400) and developed it in the argentix c41 kit (similar to unicolor I think.) First time doing c41.

Now, I don't know if the bleach is bad, but the negatives are coming out too dark or too dense. They were developed for the proper time and proper temp. I overexposed them intentionally one, two or three stops to get more saturated colours, but not six+ stops which I have seen examples of online come out perfectly in scans.

Well, after reblixing for a half hour there isn't much difference. Very difficult to get a scan out of them. I'm wondering if the blix is exhausted, despite being brand new batch of chemicals, or if there is some other problem. The negatives I thought were slightly underexposed came out damn near perfect. I metered everything before shooting.

Can I use regular bleach. If so for how long?
 

chassis

Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2011
Messages
294
Location
Midwest, USA
Format
Multi Format
How do they look now? C41 negatives look dense and/or cloudy straight out of the chemicals. Can you scan a negative? What was your development time and temperature? How did you meter the exposure? Properly exposed and developed, should be a nice looking negative.
 

klownshed

Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
441
Location
Dorset, UK
Format
Multi Format
Sounds like you overexposed the roll.

If the 'underexposed' shots came out ok, there's your clue.

There's either a camera fault/error in the exposure (wrong ISO? Slow shutter?) or over development.

my guess, as the 'underexposed' negs came out well is that it's an issue with the exposure. That's assuming that when you say the negatives are too dark, you mean the negatives themselves are dense.
 
Last edited:

geirtbr

Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2015
Messages
53
Format
35mm
If the problem is overexposure, you might get better result from using an enlarger and doing ra4 as the enlarger lamp is much more powerful and more able to get details from dense negatives than a conventional scanner.

I didnt use blix in c41, but i believe these solutions are a bit unstable. If it doesnt work at all the dark anti-halation layer on the back of the film will be present, and make things much more difficult for you.
 
OP
OP

1kgcoffee

Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2017
Messages
500
Location
Calgary
Format
Medium Format
Thanks for the responses. The negatives looked normal, just really overdeveloped/overexposed (not very transparent)

One interesting thing to note is that I didn't use a stop bath after developer, just straight to blix as per instruction. The developing tank had to be burped as it was filling up with gas. After the ruined roll, I used a stop bath of water and got this effect only after the initial agitation. Also, the temperature may have been a bit high.

Who knows why that roll turned out so poorly, but every roll since has turned out perfectly
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,262
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
The negatives were over exposed. Why are you surprised that they are dense? Hint: Use box speed. The manufacturer knows more about their product than you ever will. They tested their products more scientifically and accurately than you can ever hope to do.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom