Polaroid Type55 - OK for alt printing?

cperez

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Messages
105
Location
Portland, Or
Format
Large Format
I bashed my head against the wall of forgetful stupidity last weekend. I tried to print a TMax100 neg on Pt/Pd. Yes, I know. I was stupid. I'd forgotten about the UV layer.

In an attempt to avoid future stupidities, are there any issues printing through Type55 negs in Pt/Pd? Anything I should remember before I launch off and hit my head against the wall again?
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
People do it, but you'll want to experiment with extended development times to see if you can get the density range you need for a satisfying result.

Why not use FP4+ or Efke/Adox PL100, or do you need something that comes in packets?
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
I've tried printing T55 negs in Pd. You can do it, but a neg that has a more than adequate contrast for silver printing has a very poor contrast with pt/pd. I had to add a significant amount of NA2 to my pd sensitizer to get something other than muddy and flat for results. As a result, I have not tried again. I suspect that the film base may have similar anti-UV qualities to the new Tmax 100 film base.
 

ann

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,336
Format
35mm
i have used them with vandyke brown print, and it worked fine
 

bill schwab

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Jun 16, 2003
Messages
3,751
Location
Meeshagin
Format
Multi Format
TheFlyingCamera said:
I had to add a significant amount of NA2 to my pd sensitizer...
Click to expand...
I've never gone more than a drop, but this is the route I usually take and have had great results IMO. I have also been able to successfully control contrast with exposure as well. It can be done quite nicely. If you see anything in your polaroid print when you pull, you haven't exposed it enough yet.

Of the images below, the top one has a total of 10.5 drops of sensitizer... 5-FO, 5-PD and .5 NA2. The bottom image is without any NA2 at all. Quite a difference.



Bill
 

buggy

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2006
Messages
92
Location
Indianapolis
Format
Multi Format
billschwab said:
If you see anything in your polaroid print when you pull, you haven't exposed it enough yet
Click to expand...
I agree. If the print is white, or nearly so, the negative will probably be great.
 
OP
OP

cperez

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Messages
105
Location
Portland, Or
Format
Large Format
I was looking for a quick way of producing a few negs I could work from. If I were to use Ilford/Efke/Kodak in 4x5, then I might as well work in 8x10.

I have a growing stack of 8x10 negs expressly produced for this kind of work. But I need something smaller and quicker to print than standing in the dark for 30mins at a time to get my negative processing "just right". I'm slightly neurotic about such things. Polaroid might help eliminate one step in my long path of neurosis.

David A. Goldfarb said:
People do it, but you'll want to experiment with extended development times to see if you can get the density range you need for a satisfying result.

Why not use FP4+ or Efke/Adox PL100, or do you need something that comes in packets?
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…