Hi and thanx thus far for the replies.
Here let me provide the link to the article i was reading.
The author/ photogs name is Cooksey Talbott - cookseytalbottgallery.com
He studied under Ansel Adams from what i read of his bio.
Been published by Ansel as well in one of his books.
"The art of Polariod" i think...?
anyhow...
The article or post by the Cooksey is called:
I got a new film camera, the Gaoersi 617
here is a link - cookseytalbottgallery.com/photo_blog_article.php?blRecordNumber=29
He's the lead in pic from the article showing the camera:
he's say's in the article he temporarily glued a polarizer onto the Rangefinder
and uses a second one on the take lens.
In checking with my various sizes of Polarizer filters - hmmmh?
None have the indicator marks mentioned above
- and i thought they were/are pretty decent ones.
and that is were my consern comes into play - if you glue or attach the one on the Range Finder.
Then remove on and off the one on the take lens... they are not going to be perfectly aligned to one another.
He's using the one on the range finder to set the one on the take lens.
If i did have them both aligned when i put the one on the take lens it stands to reason
when i put it back on and it doesn't screw on exactly where it was before
- the line up of the two will be off.
What you see through the range finder would not be the same as what is being seen via the take lens.
Am i right on this?
If the polarizer is a quarter turn different than the Range Finder Polarizer is - talking rear lens of the Polarizer
the setting and out come is going to be different one to the other.
If all fails - i'll send a e-mail to Cooksey - I just figured there are a lot LF guys here that are seasoned and may know and/or use of this technique for range finders