- Joined
- May 15, 2005
- Messages
- 1,212
- Format
- 8x10 Format
Wider? Depends on how wide. Plenty of choice in the 240mm range for not much money. 210mm the choices get tougher but still quite a few.
150mm the two modern choices are the Scheinder XL for quite a bit of money. Or the Nikon SW. Hard to find.
The 120mm Nikon SW covers. Not that hard to find and not that expensive relatively. The 110mm XL supposedly just covers. More money then the Nikon.
Then you've got various older lenses.
It depends on how wide. How expensive. How heavy you want.
btw... I'm not so much after speed with the wider lens or light weight for that matter as I'm used to lugging around big cameras (3D cine) - but fast lenses would be useful in the higher focal lengths ... is 6.8 considered fast ? The Caltar here certainly is a particle accelerator of a lens (heavy)
Ole said:Wide?
I've tried:
121/8 Super Angulon (barely/almost covers - I'll keep using it on 18x24cm, but maybe not on 8x10")
165/6.8 Angulon (covers, but unlike the SA it gets soft corners where it doesn't cover). Minimal movements.
210/6.8 Angulon - lots and lots of movements. Great lens, even if mine is uncoated.
240/5.6 Symmar convertible - not all that wide, but a nice lens with good coverage.
It's not unusual for a shutter that hasn't been used much to get stuck on the slow speeds. You can exercise it to see if it can work itself out, but it's a sign that it's due for a CLA.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?